Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_225813 AI generated

Vacation-voucher claim for disability personal assistants: referral declared inadmissible on procedural grounds

Case Number ICCJ_225813
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Court of Appeal Iași seeking a preliminary ruling, thereby declining to answer whether a personal assistant of a person with disabilities is entitled to vacation vouchers under Article 37(1)(a) and (c) of Law No. 448/2006, read with Government Emergency Ordinance No. 8/2009. The referral arose in a labor and social insurance dispute in which the question was whether such assistants qualify for vacation vouchers. The court ruled the referral inadmissible under procedural law, meaning no definitive substantive answer was given on the statutory interpretation, and the dismissal is binding under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Vacation-voucher claim for disability personal assistants: referral declared inadmissible on procedural grounds: 448/2006, read with Government Emergency Ordinance No. 8/2009. The referral arose in a labor and social insurance dispute in which the question was whether such assistants qualify for vacation vouchers. The court ruled the referral inadmissible under procedural law, meaning no definitive substantive answer was given on the statutory interpretation, and the dismissal is binding under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Keywords

AI generated
disability insurance social insurance dispute Civil Procedure Code personal insurance statutory grounds preliminary ruling procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Used to declare the referral binding in the dispositive.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 147/2025
Personal assistant's entitlement to public sector vacation vouchers despite disability care legislation scope
Decizia nr. 166/2025
Referral on personal assistant's unused leave compensation rejected as inadmissible
ICCJ_226576
Personal assistant annual leave compensation ruling referral inadmissible
ICCJ_172279
Vacation voucher allocation challenge: Preliminary ruling request dismissed as inadmissible
ICCJ_228028
2022 teaching vacation vouchers referral inadmissible due to procedural bar.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Used to declare the referral binding in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 147 Dosar nr. 2564/1/2024

Ședința din 5 mai 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Iaşi - Secţia conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în dosarul nr. 1629/89/2022, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

Dacă în interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 37 alin. (1) lit. a) şi c) din Legea nr. 448/2006 privind protecţia şi promovarea drepturilor persoanelor cu handicap, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, raportat la prevederile Ordonanţei de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 8/2009 privind acordarea voucherelor de vacanţă, aprobată cu modificări şi completări prin Legea nr. 94/2014, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, asistentul personal are dreptul la acordarea de vouchere de vacanţă.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 5 mai 2025.