Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_225067 AI generated

Interpretation of "annual extension" duration for public service relationships under the Romanian Administrative Code

Case Number ICCJ_225067
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (ICCJ) dismissed the preliminary reference from the Court of Appeal of Bacău and held that the phrase "possibility of annual extension of the service relationship" under Article 517(2) of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 57/2019 (Administrative Code) is interpreted to mean that the extension duration is exactly one year. The dispute concerned a civil administrative procedure regarding the interpretation of public sector service relationships, specifically the temporal limits of extending an official's mandate. The decisive legal basis is the specific statutory interpretation of Article 517(2) of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 57/2019, as amended, which governs the duration of annual extensions for public servants, establishing a mandatory one-year limit for such extensions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Interpretation of "annual extension" duration for public service relationships under the Romanian Administrative Code: 57/2019 (Administrative Code) is interpreted to mean that the extension duration is exactly one year. The dispute concerned a civil administrative procedure regarding the interpretation of public sector service relationships, specifically the temporal limits of extending an official's mandate. The decisive legal basis is the specific statutory interpretation of Article 517(2) of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 57/2019, as amended, which governs the duration of annual extensions for public servants, establishing a mandatory one-year limit for such extensions.

Keywords

AI generated
emergency government ordinance civil service public official statutory limits e-government Civil Procedure Code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural rule establishing the mandatory nature of the court's decision in the dispositive.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 141/2025
Statutory interpretation of "annual extension" in post-retirement public service tenure: mandatory one-year duration for each extension
Decizia nr. 4/2024
Interpretation of the one-year deadline for installment payment of public sector salary debts under OUG No. 114/2018
ICCJ_232203
Termination of public service relationship upon anticipatory pension eligibility under Administrative Code
Decizia nr. 891/2020
Statute of limitations extension under Law No. 554/2004 for administrative acts challenging the restitution of public funds
ICCJ_223235
Interpretation of Article 612 of the Administrative Code: Obligation to transform contractual posts into public functions and validity of post-deadline requests

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural rule establishing the mandatory nature of the court's decision in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 141 Dosar nr. 2542/1/2024

Ședința din 7 aprilie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Bacău - Secţia a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal în dosarul nr.2883/103/2023, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile și, în consecință, stabilește că:

Dispoziţiile art.517 alin. (2) din Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 57/2019 privind Codul administrativ, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, cu privire la sintagma „posibilitatea prelungirii anuale a raportului de serviciu” se interpretează în sensul că durata prelungirii este de un an.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 7 aprilie 2025.