Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_225061 AI generated

Admissibility of preliminary ruling on payment of statutory salary differences for probation counsels

Case Number ICCJ_225061
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible a request for a preliminary ruling on a legal question, leaving the original proceedings pending before the Cluj Court of Appeal. The dispute concerned the mandatory payment of the full difference between the statutory salaries established for probation counsels and the amounts effectively paid. The court applied Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code to determine that the reference was procedurally improper or failed to meet the statutory requirements for engaging the specialized composition for resolving legal questions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of preliminary ruling on payment of statutory salary differences for probation counsels: The dispute concerned the mandatory payment of the full difference between the statutory salaries established for probation counsels and the amounts effectively paid. The court applied Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code to determine that the reference was procedurally improper or failed to meet the statutory requirements for engaging the specialized composition for resolving legal questions.

Keywords

AI generated
reference for a preliminary ruling Civil Procedure Code preliminary question pending proceedings statutory requirement judicial assistance in civil matters

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision resolving the inadmissibility of the preliminary ruling is binding.
AI generated
ICCJ_229357
Admissibility of preliminary rulings on enforceability of judicial salary decisions issued by credit authorizers
Decizia nr. 135/2025
Precedent ruling request inadmissible where wage difference payment claim lacks genuine legal interpretation issue
ICCJ_134005
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on calculation base for public sector salary recovery and residual credit claim
ICCJ_213697
Admissibility of preliminary reference on emergency ordinances derogating from public sector salary framework
ICCJ_220670
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on salary coefficient for legal staff in national authority

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision resolving the inadmissibility of the preliminary ruling is binding.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 135 Dosar nr. 61/1/2025

Ședința din 7 aprilie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Cluj – Secţia mixtă de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, de conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale în dosarul nr. 1657/117/2024, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

Rezolvarea de principiu a chestiunii de drept constând în plata integrală printr-o singură operaţiune financiară a sumelor de bani reprezentând diferenţa dintre salariile stabilite neplafonat prin ordin al ministrului justiţiei pentru consilierii din sistemul de probaţiune şi salariile efectiv plătite.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 7 aprilie 2025.