Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_225023 AI generated

Admissibility of referral on salary classification for directors of standalone nurseries under education versus administration occupational families

Case Number ICCJ_225023
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (ICCJ) dismissed as inadmissible the referral for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Cluj Court of Appeal regarding the correct salary classification for the director of a standalone nursery. The dispute concerned whether such a director, employed in a pre-university educational institution established under Article 27(13) of the National Education Law, should be classified under the “Education” occupational family (Annex I) or the “Administration” occupational family (Annex VIII) of the Framework Law No. 153/2017, as amended by Emergency Government Ordinance No. 100/2021. The ICCJ determined that the question did not meet the legal threshold for a mandatory preliminary ruling under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, leaving the lower court to resolve the classification issue without a binding supreme court directive.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 27 alin. (13) din Legea nr. 1/2011, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of referral on salary classification for directors of standalone nurseries under education versus administration occupational families: The dispute concerned whether such a director, employed in a pre-university educational institution established under Article 27(13) of the National Education Law, should be classified under the “Education” occupational family (Annex I) or the “Administration” occupational family (Annex VIII) of the Framework Law No. 153/2017, as amended by Emergency Government Ordinance No. 100/2021. The ICCJ determined that the question did not meet the legal threshold for a mandatory preliminary ruling under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, leaving the lower court to resolve the classification issue without a binding supreme court directive.

Keywords

AI generated
salary classification nursery schools preliminary decision preliminary ruling procedure Civil Procedure Code administration of justice

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 27 alin. (13) din Legea nr. 1/2011
Dacă încadrarea salarială a directorului unei creşe nearondate unei alte instituţii de învăţământ preuniversitar, instituţie înfiinţată în temeiul art. 27 alin. (13) din Legea nr. 1/2011 a educaţiei naţionale, în forma modificată prin Ordonanţa de Urgenţă a Guvernului nr.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory nature of the decision on the referral for a preliminary ruling.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 114/2025
Salary classification of unannexed state nursery director: education versus administration occupational family and inadmissibility of preliminary ruling request for norm identification
ICCJ_225021
Admissibility of referral on interpretation of public sector salary calculation; referrals rejected as inadmissible
Decizia nr. 71/2026
Inadmissibility of preliminary ruling referral regarding the distinction between central and local public administration in the salary classification of hospital technical staff under Annex VII to Law No. 153/2017
ICCJ_235034
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on salary classification under Annex VII of Framework Law No. 153/2017 for public healthcare administrative staff transferred to local authorities
Decizia nr. 131/2025
Referral on public sector salary classification for hospital staff rejected as inadmissible

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory nature of the decision on the referral for a preliminary ruling.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 114 Dosar nr. 2552/1/2024

Ședința din 31 martie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Cluj - Secţia a IV-a pentru litigii de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în dosarul nr. 802/84/2023, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

Dacă încadrarea salarială a directorului unei creşe nearondate unei alte instituţii de învăţământ preuniversitar, instituţie înfiinţată în temeiul art. 27 alin. (13) din Legea nr. 1/2011 a educaţiei naţionale, în forma modificată prin Ordonanţa de Urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 100/2021 pentru modificarea şi completarea Legii educaţiei naţionale nr. 1/2011 şi abrogarea unor acte normative, se realizează în temeiul Anexei I privind familia ocupaţională „Învăţământ” la Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017 sau în temeiul Anexei VIII privind familia ocupaţională „Administraţie”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 31 martie 2025.