Admissibility of referral on interpretation of public sector salary calculation; referrals rejected as inadmissible
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the connected referrals filed by the Botoșani Tribunal to resolve a legal question regarding the salary calculation framework for pre-university educational staff. The dispute centered on whether, pursuant to Article 12 of Framework Law No. 153/2017, salaries for teaching and auxiliary educational staff should be determined by multiplying the coefficients in Annex No. 1 by the guaranteed minimum gross national base salary set by Government Decision from January 1, 2023. By rejecting the referrals, the Court declined to issue a preliminary ruling on this interpretative issue, leaving the legal question unresolved by this instance. The decision is grounded in the procedural grounds for inadmissibility under the Code of Civil Procedure, specifically addressing the validity of the requests for clarification of law.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of referral on interpretation of public sector salary calculation; referrals rejected as inadmissible: The dispute centered on whether, pursuant to Article 12 of Framework Law No. 153/2017, salaries for teaching and auxiliary educational staff should be determined by multiplying the coefficients in Annex No. 1 by the guaranteed minimum gross national base salary set by Government Decision from January 1, 2023. By rejecting the referrals, the Court declined to issue a preliminary ruling on this interpretative issue, leaving the legal question unresolved by this instance. The decision is grounded in the procedural grounds for inadmissibility under the Code of Civil Procedure, specifically addressing the validity of the requests for clarification of law.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited in the dispositive to establish that the decision rejecting the referrals is mandatory and binding.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr. 112 Dosar nr. 2393/1/2024
Ședința din 31 martie 2025
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Respinge, ca inadmisibile, sesizările conexate formulate de Tribunalul Botoşani – Secţia I civilă în dosarele nr. 2635/40/2023, nr. 2799/40/2023 şi nr. 1629/40/2023, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:
Dacă, în interpretarea art. 12 din Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017 privind salarizarea personalului plătit din fonduri publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, începând cu data de 1 ianuarie 2023, salarizarea personalului didactic şi a personalului didactic auxiliar din învăţământul preuniversitar se stabileşte prin înmulţirea coeficienţilor prevăzuţi de anexa nr. I cu salariul de bază minim brut pe ţară garantat în plată stabilit prin hotărâre de Guvern.
Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 31 martie 2025.