Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_225021 AI generated

Admissibility of referral on interpretation of public sector salary calculation; referrals rejected as inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_225021
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the connected referrals filed by the Botoșani Tribunal to resolve a legal question regarding the salary calculation framework for pre-university educational staff. The dispute centered on whether, pursuant to Article 12 of Framework Law No. 153/2017, salaries for teaching and auxiliary educational staff should be determined by multiplying the coefficients in Annex No. 1 by the guaranteed minimum gross national base salary set by Government Decision from January 1, 2023. By rejecting the referrals, the Court declined to issue a preliminary ruling on this interpretative issue, leaving the legal question unresolved by this instance. The decision is grounded in the procedural grounds for inadmissibility under the Code of Civil Procedure, specifically addressing the validity of the requests for clarification of law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of referral on interpretation of public sector salary calculation; referrals rejected as inadmissible: The dispute centered on whether, pursuant to Article 12 of Framework Law No. 153/2017, salaries for teaching and auxiliary educational staff should be determined by multiplying the coefficients in Annex No. 1 by the guaranteed minimum gross national base salary set by Government Decision from January 1, 2023. By rejecting the referrals, the Court declined to issue a preliminary ruling on this interpretative issue, leaving the legal question unresolved by this instance. The decision is grounded in the procedural grounds for inadmissibility under the Code of Civil Procedure, specifically addressing the validity of the requests for clarification of law.

Keywords

AI generated
calculation of salary minimum wage preliminary ruling procedure rulings determining validity preliminary decision Civil Procedure Code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision rejecting the referrals is mandatory and binding.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision rejecting the referrals is mandatory and binding.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 112 Dosar nr. 2393/1/2024

Ședința din 31 martie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibile, sesizările conexate formulate de Tribunalul Botoşani – Secţia I civilă în dosarele nr. 2635/40/2023, nr. 2799/40/2023 şi nr. 1629/40/2023, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

Dacă, în interpretarea art. 12 din Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017 privind salarizarea personalului plătit din fonduri publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, începând cu data de 1 ianuarie 2023, salarizarea personalului didactic şi a personalului didactic auxiliar din învăţământul preuniversitar se stabileşte prin înmulţirea coeficienţilor prevăzuţi de anexa nr. I cu salariul de bază minim brut pe ţară garantat în plată stabilit prin hotărâre de Guvern.

Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 31 martie 2025.