Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_225020 AI generated

Eligibility of judicial police officers for the 25% risk and neuropsychic overexertion allowance

Case Number ICCJ_225020
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the preliminary reference submitted by the Mehedinți Tribunal, thereby leaving the lower court to resolve the dispute without a binding legal interpretation from the supreme court. The case concerned a civil employment dispute where special-status public officials serving as judicial police officers and designated judicial investigation bodies sought confirmation that they were entitled to a 25% risk and neuropsychic overexertion allowance, based on a challenge to the interpretation of their salary components. The decisive legal analysis involved the interplay between Article 5 of Annex No. V and Article 13 of Annex No. VI of the Framework Law No. 153/2017, combined with the specific provisions of Order No. S/7/2018 issued by the Ministry of Internal Affairs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Eligibility of judicial police officers for the 25% risk and neuropsychic overexertion allowance: The case concerned a civil employment dispute where special-status public officials serving as judicial police officers and designated judicial investigation bodies sought confirmation that they were entitled to a 25% risk and neuropsychic overexertion allowance, based on a challenge to the interpretation of their salary components. The decisive legal analysis involved the interplay between Article 5 of Annex No. V and Article 13 of Annex No. VI of the Framework Law No. 153/2017, combined with the specific provisions of Order No. S/7/2018 issued by the Ministry of Internal Affairs.

Keywords

AI generated
police officers public employment law judicial law judicial investigation public legal official designated employment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the decision and the procedural obligation imposed on the referring court.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 1474/2009
Entitlement of judicial police officers to magistrates' risk and neuropsychological overexertion allowances; exclusion under specific salary regulations
Decizia nr. 5591/2010
Eligibility of seconded judicial police officers for magistrate-specific risk and neuropsychic overload allowances under distinct salary regimes
Decizia nr. 2456/2009
Entitlement of detailed police officers at the National Anticorruption Directorate to the 50% risk and neuropsychic overstrain allowance under Law No. 50/1996
Decizia nr. 2461/2009
Judicial police officers denied 50% risk allowance as appeals court finds salary assimilation limited to base pay.
Decizia nr. 2272/2010
Retroactive suspension of judicial risk and overexertion allowances: abuse of power, non-retroactivity, and inapplicability of budgetary emergency ordinance

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the decision and the procedural obligation imposed on the referring court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 111 Dosar nr. 2444/1/2024

Ședința din 31 martie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Mehedinţi – Secţia a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 6796/3/2024, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Dacă, prin raportare la art. 5 al Anexei nr. V şi art. 13 al Anexei nr. VI din Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017, coroborate cu prevederile Ordinului M.A.I. nr. S/7/2018, funcţionarii publici cu statut special care activează în cadrul poliţiei judiciare şi au calitatea de organ de cercetare al poliţiei judiciare desemnaţi nominal, prin avizul conform al Procurorului General al Parchetului de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie, beneficiază de sporul pentru risc şi suprasolicitare neuropsihică de 25% din salariul de funcţie”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 31 martie 2025.