Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_224990 AI generated

Retirement-condition dispute referral inadmissible for preliminary ruling.

Case Number ICCJ_224990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Bucharest Court of Appeal seeking a preliminary ruling on whether, under Article 69(1)–(2) of Law No. 567/2004 (the statute for auxiliary court and prosecutor's office personnel), the right to an indemnity is conditioned on the beneficiary's retirement or release from office for reasons not imputable to them. The decision—binding under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure—leaves the underlying case pending and does not resolve the substantive question, as the referral failed to meet the admissibility requirements for a preliminary ruling.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Retirement-condition dispute referral inadmissible for preliminary ruling: 567/2004 (the statute for auxiliary court and prosecutor's office personnel), the right to an indemnity is conditioned on the beneficiary's retirement or release from office for reasons not imputable to them. The decision—binding under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure—leaves the underlying case pending and does not resolve the substantive question, as the referral failed to meet the admissibility requirements for a preliminary ruling.

Keywords

AI generated
retirement conditions preliminary decision preliminary ruling procedure article of civil procedure referral to separate proceedings deferral of pension

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to make the decision binding.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 95/2025
Preliminary referral on severance-allowance conditions inadmissible for lack of genuine legal question
Decizia nr. 2/2020
Referral for preliminary ruling inadmissible; claimant's pension award stands
ICCJ_230276
Referral for preliminary ruling on salary rights of suspended public servants inadmissible.
ICCJ_217293
Preliminary referral on judicial service pension eligibility ruled inadmissible on procedural grounds
ICCJ_230272
Referral on date of partial early retirement declared inadmissible

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to make the decision binding.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 95 Dosar nr. 2377/1/2024

Ședința din 17 martie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Bucureşti - Secţia a VII-a pentru cauze privind conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în dosarul nr. 26807/3/2023, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

Dacă, în interpretarea art. 69 alin. (1) şi (2) din Legea nr. 567/2004 privind statutul personalului auxiliar de specialitate al instanţelor judecătoreşti şi al parchetelor de pe lângă acestea şi al personalului care funcţionează în cadrul Institutului Naţional de Expertize Criminalistice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, dreptul la indemnizaţie este sau nu condiţionat de ieşirea la pensie a beneficiarului ori de eliberarea sa din funcţie din motive neimputabile.

Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 17 martie 2025.