Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_224988 AI generated

Statutory cap on military pensions survives; preliminary ruling referral on its validity inadmissible.

Case Number ICCJ_224988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Bihor Tribunal for a preliminary ruling, so the challenged statutory cap on military pensions remains in force. The dispute arose in an administrative-fiscal case where a claimant contested the calculation bulletin for a state military pension, asking whether the ceiling introduced by Article VII points 2 and 3 of Emergency Ordinance No. 59/2017 (amending Articles 3, 59, and 60 of Law No. 223/2015) could be disregarded when issuing the bulletin. The court held the referral inadmissible under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, finding that the conditions for a preliminary ruling were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 60 din Legea nr. 223/2015; Statutory cap on military pensions survives; preliminary ruling referral on its validity inadmissible: The dispute arose in an administrative-fiscal case where a claimant contested the calculation bulletin for a state military pension, asking whether the ceiling introduced by Article VII points 2 and 3 of Emergency Ordinance No. 59/2017 (amending Articles 3, 59, and 60 of Law No. 223/2015) could be disregarded when issuing the bulletin. The court held the referral inadmissible under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, finding that the conditions for a preliminary ruling were not met.

Keywords

AI generated
pension entitlement fiscal law preliminary ruling procedure Civil Procedure Code temporary pension administrative dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 60 din Legea nr. 223/2015
59 şi art. 60 din Legea nr. 223/2015 privind pensiile militare de stat.”
AI generated
Decizia nr. 302/2025
Pension surcharge inclusion in statutory cap: preliminary ruling request dismissed as inadmissible
ICCJ_230694
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on statutory cap applicability to contributive military pension calculations
Decizia nr. 13/2021
Military pension increases included in 85% cap; referral on pension calculation inadmissible.
Decizia nr. 103/2025
Military pension cap: whether supplementary pension fund contribution surcharges fall within or are added to the 85% statutory limit
Decizia nr. 197/2025
Military pension allowance dispute referral rejected as inadmissible as theoretical; case remanded for merits.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 93 Dosar nr. 2485/1/2024

Ședința din 17 martie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Bihor – Secţia a III-a contencios administrativ şi fiscal în dosarul nr. 4579/111/2023, pentru pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

„Dacă la emiterea buletinului de calcul în baza căruia se calculează cuantumul pensiei militare de stat prevăzută de Legea nr. 223/2015 se poate elimina plafonarea instituită de legiuitor prin articolul VII pct. 2 şi pct. 3 din Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 59/04.08.2017 în vigoare de la data de 04.08.2017, articol prin care au fost modificate prevederile art. 3, art. 59 şi art. 60 din Legea nr. 223/2015 privind pensiile militare de stat.”

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 17 martie 2025.