Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_224987 AI generated

Military prosecutor's base salary reference value referral dismissed as inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_224987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Bucharest Court of Appeal seeking a preliminary ruling, so no substantive decision was issued and the underlying case remains pending. The dispute concerned whether the base salary (solda de funcție) of a specialist officer in the military prosecutor's section of the Prosecutor's Office attached to the High Court should be calculated using the sectoral reference value of 484.18 lei from the "Justice" budget occupational family, or under the rules of the "Defense, public order, and national security" family. The court based its dismissal on procedural inadmissibility under the relevant provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure (art. 521 alin. 3), meaning the referral did not meet the statutory conditions for a preliminary ruling on questions of law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Military prosecutor's base salary reference value referral dismissed as inadmissible: The dispute concerned whether the base salary (solda de funcție) of a specialist officer in the military prosecutor's section of the Prosecutor's Office attached to the High Court should be calculated using the sectoral reference value of 484.18 lei from the "Justice" budget occupational family, or under the rules of the "Defense, public order, and national security" family. The court based its dismissal on procedural inadmissibility under the relevant provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure (art. 521 alin. 3), meaning the referral did not meet the statutory conditions for a preliminary ruling on questions of law.

Keywords

AI generated
reference for a preliminary ruling relevant salary Civil Procedure Code referral order procedural issues value in dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
The provision that makes the decision binding, explicitly cited in the dispositive.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 92/2025
Military officer’s salary reference value bid inadmissible in preliminary ruling challenge
Decizia nr. 177/2025
Inadmissibility of preliminary referrals for military salary recalculation due to failure to identify a distinct legal question
ICCJ_226582
Preliminary salary-calculation referral inadmissible; lower court decision stands.
ICCJ_228036
Public servant legal adviser salary classification referral ruled inadmissible
ICCJ_222079
Preliminary ruling referral on military institute staff salaries inadmissible.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

The provision that makes the decision binding, explicitly cited in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 92 Dosar nr. 2352/1/2024

Ședința din 17 martie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Bucureşti – Secţia a VII-a pentru cauze privind conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în dosarul nr. 17330/3/2020*, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Dacă solda de funcţie cuvenită personalului încadrat în funcţia de ofiţer specialist în cadrul Secţiei Parchetelor Militare din Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie se stabileşte prin raportare la o valoare de referinţă sectorială de 484,18 lei specifică Familiei Ocupaţionale de Funcţii Bugetare „Justiţie” sau potrivit prevederilor specifice Familiei Ocupaţionale de Funcţii Bugetare „Apărare, ordine publică şi securitate naţională”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 17 martie 2025.