Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_224986 AI generated

Pension allowance calculation question to High Court ruled inadmissible for preliminary ruling.

Case Number ICCJ_224986
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Ilfov Tribunal seeking a preliminary ruling on whether the 50% allowance under Art. 1(1) and (3) of Law No. 8/2006 (for pensioners who are members of recognized creators' unions) is calculated on the gross or net pension amount; because the referral was rejected as inadmissible, no binding interpretation was issued and the underlying case remains governed by the ordinary rules. The dispute concerned the method of computing a statutory allowance for union-member pensioners, and the court based its dismissal on procedural admissibility requirements for preliminary rulings under Art. 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, without reaching the merits of the substantive pension-law question.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 1 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 8/2006; Pension allowance calculation question to High Court ruled inadmissible for preliminary ruling: 1(1) and (3) of Law No. 8/2006 (for pensioners who are members of recognized creators' unions) is calculated on the gross or net pension amount; because the referral was rejected as inadmissible, no binding interpretation was issued and the underlying case remains governed by the ordinary rules. The dispute concerned the method of computing a statutory allowance for union-member pensioners, and the court based its dismissal on procedural admissibility requirements for preliminary rulings under Art. 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, without reaching the merits of the substantive pension-law question.

Keywords

AI generated
pension calculation preliminary ruling procedure preliminary decision in social insurance preliminary question procedural issues statutory requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 1 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 8/2006
„Modalitatea de calcul a indemnizației prevăzute de art. 1 alin.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 366/2025
Preliminary ruling on pension inclusion of salary rights inadmissible as no genuine legal question and prior decisions govern.
Decizia nr. 91/2025
Military pension 50% allowance calculation method referral inadmissible as no genuine question of law
ICCJ_213619
Partial early pension recalculation query inadmissible for preliminary ruling
ICCJ_188378
Pension contribution period revision query deemed inadmissible for preliminary ruling.
ICCJ_171946
Pension-update referral inadmissible; preliminary ruling rejected on procedural grounds.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 91 Dosar nr. 2482/1/2024

Ședința din 17 martie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Ilfov-Secţia civilă în dosarul nr. 1904/93/2022, privind lămurirea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Modalitatea de calcul a indemnizației prevăzute de art. 1 alin. (1) și (3) din Legea nr. 8/2006 privind instituirea indemnizaţiei pentru pensionarii sistemului public de pensii, membri ai uniunilor de creatori legal constituite şi recunoscute ca persoane juridice de utilitate publică, republicată, cu modificările ulterioare, respectiv dacă procentul de 50%, prevăzut de art. 1 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 8/2006, se aplică asupra cuantumului brut sau asupra cuantumului net din pensia cuvenită titularului sau, după caz, aflată în plată la data solicitării.”

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 17 martie 2025.