Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_223227 AI generated

Referral on judicial auxiliary salary derogations dismissed as inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_223227
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral for a preliminary ruling on questions of law submitted by the Sibiu County Court, thereby leaving the lower court to resolve the underlying dispute without binding guidance from the supreme court. The case concerned a civil or administrative dispute regarding the salary structure of judicial auxiliary staff, specifically whether the special provisions of Law No. 567/2004 could derogate from the general public sector salary framework established by Framework Law No. 153/2017 (Annex VIII) to allow base salaries exceeding standard pay scales, and whether such application was subject to restrictions imposed by Emergency Government Ordinance No. 99/2023 concerning the settlement of arrears by public institutions. The decisive legal basis involved the interplay between Article 902(1) of Law No. 567/2004, Article 9 of Framework Law No. 153/2017, and Article 1(2) of OUG No. 99/2023, with the Supreme Court's procedural decision under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure effectively blocking the requested clarification on these statutory conflicts.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 902 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 567/2004, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Referral on judicial auxiliary salary derogations dismissed as inadmissible: The case concerned a civil or administrative dispute regarding the salary structure of judicial auxiliary staff, specifically whether the special provisions of Law No. 567/2004 could derogate from the general public sector salary framework established by Framework Law No. 153/2017 (Annex VIII) to allow base salaries exceeding standard pay scales, and whether such application was subject to restrictions imposed by Emergency Government Ordinance No. 99/2023 concerning the settlement of arrears by public institutions. The decisive legal basis involved the interplay between Article 902(1) of Law No. 567/2004, Article 9 of Framework Law No. 153/2017, and Article 1(2) of OUG No. 99/2023, with the Supreme Court's procedural decision under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure effectively blocking the requested clarification on these statutory conflicts.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial law derogation from law settlement of dispute preliminary ruling procedure article of civil procedure framework decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 902 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 567/2004
Dacă această aplicare a prevederilor art. 902 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 567/2004 este supusă restricției stabilite prin art.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited as the basis for the mandatory nature of the decision, which is the only provision explicitly mentioned in the dispositive section.
AI generated
ICCJ_230278
Judicial salary compensation tax referral dismissed as inadmissible without merits ruling
Decizia nr. 72/2025
Preliminary reference on salary derogation for court auxiliary staff ruled inadmissible due to lack of genuine legal difficulty
ICCJ_230276
Referral for preliminary ruling on salary rights of suspended public servants inadmissible.
ICCJ_127715
Salary referral deemed inadmissible as abstract; pay dispute returns to lower court
Decizia nr. 71/2024
Preliminary ruling referrals on cross-institution salary equalization dismissed as inadmissible for lack of genuine legal question under GEO 62/2024.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited as the basis for the mandatory nature of the decision, which is the only provision explicitly mentioned in the dispositive section.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 72 Dosar nr. 2469/1/2024

Ședința din 3 martie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Sibiu - Secţia a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 1945/85/2024, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarele chestiuni de drept:

Dacă aplicarea prevederilor art. 902 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 567/2004 privind statutul personalului auxiliar de specialitate al instanțelor judecătorești şi al parchetelor de pe lângă acestea şi al personalului care funcționează în cadrul Institutului Naţional de Expertize Criminalistice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, poate deroga de la prevederile art. 9 din Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017 privind salarizarea personalului plătit din fonduri publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, cu trimitere la anexa nr. VIII cap. I lit. A – Salarizarea funcționarilor publici, în sensul depășirii nivelului salarial de bază stabilit în grilele de salarizare;

Dacă această aplicare a prevederilor art. 902 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 567/2004 este supusă restricției stabilite prin art. 1 alin. (2) din Ordonanța de urgență a Guvernului nr. 99/2023 privind unele măsuri pentru raportarea arieratelor de către instituțiile publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 3 martie 2025.