Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_223182 AI generated

Pension revision eligibility under Law No. 263/2010 for post-retirement judicial recognition of pre-retirement salary rights

Case Number ICCJ_223182
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the preliminary ruling request and issued a mandatory interpretation stating that Article 107(1) of Law No. 263/2010 applies to pensioners who, after retirement, obtain a final judicial decision and employer certification recognizing unpaid salary rights attributable to the pre-retirement period. The dispute concerned whether such retroactive salary recognitions trigger a mandatory pension review under the Public Pension System, specifically for former magistrates. The Court established that the application of Article 107(1) results in paying the difference between the previously established pension and the recalculated pension amount starting from the date of retirement, subject to the limitations in Article 107(2), thereby defining the substantive rights and procedural scope for revision cases involving post-retirement salary adjustments.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 107 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010, art. 107 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 263/2010, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Pension revision eligibility under Law No. 263/2010 for post-retirement judicial recognition of pre-retirement salary rights: 263/2010 applies to pensioners who, after retirement, obtain a final judicial decision and employer certification recognizing unpaid salary rights attributable to the pre-retirement period. The dispute concerned whether such retroactive salary recognitions trigger a mandatory pension review under the Public Pension System, specifically for former magistrates. The Court established that the application of Article 107(1) results in paying the difference between the previously established pension and the recalculated pension amount starting from the date of retirement, subject to the limitations in Article 107(2), thereby defining the substantive rights and procedural scope for revision cases involving post-retirement salary adjustments.

Keywords

AI generated
pension revision retirement judicial law grounds for revision scope of review in cassation procedural rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 107 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010
Main ground for the verdict, establishing that the provision applies to pension revision requests based on judicially recognized salary rights acquired prior to retirement.
art. 107 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 263/2010
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive, defining the temporal limits and conditions for paying the difference between the previously established and revised pension.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural provision cited to establish that the preliminary ruling issued by the court is mandatory for the court that referred the question.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 107 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010

Main ground for the verdict, establishing that the provision applies to pension revision requests based on judicially recognized salary rights acquired prior to retirement.

art. 107 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 263/2010

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive, defining the temporal limits and conditions for paying the difference between the previously established and revised pension.

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural provision cited to establish that the preliminary ruling issued by the court is mandatory for the court that referred the question.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 44 Dosar nr. 2206/1/2024

Ședința din 24 februarie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile formulată de Curtea de Apel Ploieşti – Secţia I civilă prin Încheierea din 18 septembrie 2024, în Dosarul nr. 118/120/2023, şi în consecinţă:

În interpretarea art. 107 alin. (1) şi (2) din Legea nr. 263/2010 privind sistemul unitar de pensii publice, stabileşte următoarele:

Dispoziţiile art. 107 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010 privind revizuirea drepturilor de pensie sunt aplicabile cererii formulate de un pensionar (fost magistrat), în situaţia în care, ulterior stabilirii drepturilor sale de pensie, acesta obţine o hotărâre judecătorească definitivă de recunoaştere a unor drepturi salariale începând cu o dată anterioară pensionării, precum şi adeverinţa eliberată de angajator cu menţiunea în acest sens.

Consecinţa incidenţei art. 107 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010 o reprezintă acordarea diferenţei dintre drepturile de pensie stabilite prin decizia anterioară şi cele stabilite prin decizia de revizuire începând cu data pensionării şi cu respectarea prevederilor art. 107 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 263/2010.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 24 februarie 2025.