Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_222141 AI generated

Admissibility of reference on whether public sector harmful condition and electromagnetic wave allowances bypass statutory budgetary salary caps

Case Number ICCJ_222141
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected as inadmissible the reference for uniform application of law submitted by the Bucharest Court of Appeal, thereby denying the requesting appellate court's request for a preliminary ruling on whether specific employment allowances are payable regardless of budgetary limitations. The dispute concerned the interpretation of the interplay between Government Decree No. 34/2018 (regarding educational staff) and Government Decree No. 917/2017 (regarding administrative staff) on the entitlement to harmful working conditions and electromagnetic wave surpluses, specifically whether these payments must be granted even if they exceed the personnel expenditure limits set by the approved revenue and expenditure budget. The legal basis for the decision rested on the procedural framework of Article 25 of Law No. 153/2017 governing the salary of public sector personnel, combined with the procedural rules for resolving conflicts of law in civil procedure, resulting in the inadmissibility of the sesizare and leaving the original procedural posture unresolved by the supreme court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of reference on whether public sector harmful condition and electromagnetic wave allowances bypass statutory budgetary salary caps: The dispute concerned the interpretation of the interplay between Government Decree No. 34/2018 (regarding educational staff) and Government Decree No. 917/2017 (regarding administrative staff) on the entitlement to harmful working conditions and electromagnetic wave surpluses, specifically whether these payments must be granted even if they exceed the personnel expenditure limits set by the approved revenue and expenditure budget. The legal basis for the decision rested on the procedural framework of Article 25 of Law No. 153/2017 governing the salary of public sector personnel, combined with the procedural rules for resolving conflicts of law in civil procedure, resulting in the inadmissibility of the sesizare and leaving the original procedural posture unresolved by the supreme court.

Keywords

AI generated
public employment law reference for a preliminary ruling employment reference budgetary rules statutory limits public expenditure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to state that the decision is mandatory and final, establishing the procedural basis for the admissibility rejection of the reference for uniform application of law.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 22/2025
Budgetary caps on public sector allowances: whether hazard and electromagnetic field bonuses must be paid despite exceeding the 30% personnel expenditure limit under Law No. 153/2017
ICCJ_178561
Admissibility of judicial reference on public sector wage calculation under Law No. 153/2017
ICCJ_223190
Admissibility of preliminary question on hazardous work allowance and non-discrimination in public sector salaries under Law 153/2017
ICCJ_225021
Admissibility of referral on interpretation of public sector salary calculation; referrals rejected as inadmissible
ICCJ_220637
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on uncapped public sector salary calculation for equality claims under Law 153/2017

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to state that the decision is mandatory and final, establishing the procedural basis for the admissibility rejection of the reference for uniform application of law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 22 Dosar nr. 2516/1/2024

Ședința din 27 ianuarie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge ca inadmisibilă sesizarea formulată Curtea de Apel Bucureşti -Secţia a VII-a pentru cauze privind conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale în Dosarul nr. 15.373/3/2023, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

Sporul de condiţii vătămătoare şi sporul de unde electromagnetice, reglementat de Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 34/2018 pentru aprobarea Regulamentului-cadru privind stabilirea locurilor de muncă, a categoriilor de personal, a mărimii concrete a sporului pentru condiţii de muncă, precum şi a condiţiilor de acordare a acestuia pentru personalul din familia ocupaţională de funcţii bugetare „Învăţământ” şi Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 917/2017 pentru aprobarea Regulamentului-cadru privind stabilirea locurilor de muncă, a categoriilor de personal, a mărimii concrete a sporului pentru condiţii de muncă, precum şi a condiţiilor de acordare a acestuia pentru familia ocupaţională de funcţii bugetare „Administraţie” din administraţia publică centrală se acordă indiferent de depăşirea sumelor prevăzute pentru cheltuielile de personal prin bugetul de venituri aprobat conform art. 25 din Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017 privind salarizarea personalului plătit din fonduri publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare.

Obligatorie potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 27 ianuarie 2025.