Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_222139 AI generated

Survival of pre-2017 public sector stability bonuses under the 2017 Framework Law

Case Number ICCJ_222139
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the reference for the solution of a legal issue filed by the Alba County Court, leaving the lower court to resolve the matter without a binding precedent. The dispute concerned whether the 15% stability bonus provided under Law No. 63/2011 remains payable to public employees after the entry into force of the Framework Law No. 153/2017, specifically regarding the application of the percentage to the base salary. The court's decision was based on procedural grounds under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs the admissibility of such references to the Complete Panel for Resolving Issues of Law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Survival of pre-2017 public sector stability bonuses under the 2017 Framework Law: The dispute concerned whether the 15% stability bonus provided under Law No. 63/2011 remains payable to public employees after the entry into force of the Framework Law No. 153/2017, specifically regarding the application of the percentage to the base salary. The court's decision was based on procedural grounds under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs the admissibility of such references to the Complete Panel for Resolving Issues of Law.

Keywords

AI generated
framework decision grounds for cassation entry into force matter in dispute Civil Procedure Code procedural issues

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory nature of the court's decision.
AI generated
ICCJ_225824
Eligibility of terminated public sector employees for the Article 21(3) Law No. 153/2017 salary bonus
ICCJ_228089
Salary cap calculation for public servants: validity of including judicially awarded bonuses and cross-agency salary comparisons under Framework Law 153/2017
ICCJ_224982
Classification of seniority bonus under Law 153/2017 as gross salary subject to EO 168/2022 caps
ICCJ_229368
Referral on public sector salary compensation inadmissible under Framework Law No. 153/2017
ICCJ_226592
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on calculation of hazardous-work salary bonus and supplementary leave for public sector employees.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory nature of the court's decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 20 Dosar nr. 2214/1/2024

Ședința din 27 ianuarie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge ca inadmisibilă sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Alba - Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 1263/107/2023, privind dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Dacă sporul de stabilitate prevăzut de Legea nr. 63/2011 se acordă şi după intrarea în vigoare a Legii-cadru nr. 153/2017, respectiv prin aplicarea procentului de 15% la salariul de bază?”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 27 ianuarie 2025.