Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_222134 AI generated

Admissibility of unified reference on 25% salary supplement for state-secret classified positions under Framework Law 153/2017

Case Number ICCJ_222134
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the conjoined references for the settlement of a legal issue submitted by the Cluj-Napoca Court of Appeal, Suceava Court of First Instance, and Călărași Court of First Instance, thereby leaving the lower courts to proceed without a preliminary ruling from the supreme court. The dispute concerned the interpretation and application of Article 15l in Annex No. VI of Framework Law No. 153/2017, specifically regarding the entitlement to a salary supplement of up to 25% of the base salary or functional allowance for positions with access to state-secret classified information. The decision was issued under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, rendering the ruling obligatory for the referring courts.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of unified reference on 25% salary supplement for state-secret classified positions under Framework Law 153/2017: The dispute concerned the interpretation and application of Article 15l in Annex No. VI of Framework Law No. 153/2017, specifically regarding the entitlement to a salary supplement of up to 25% of the base salary or functional allowance for positions with access to state-secret classified information. The decision was issued under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, rendering the ruling obligatory for the referring courts.

Keywords

AI generated
reference for a preliminary ruling framework decision State secret Civil Procedure Code settlement of dispute functional allowance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited to establish the obligatory nature of the decision regarding the dismissal of the inadmissible references.
AI generated
ICCJ_156419
Inadmissibility of preliminary reference on 15% disability salary supplement under Law 153/2017 and Government Decision 751/2018
ICCJ_220712
Admissibility of preliminary reference on equal pay for identical work in public sector employment under Framework Law 153/2017
ICCJ_230721
Preliminary reference on public sector salary equality under Framework Law 153/2017 dismissed as inadmissible
ICCJ_178561
Admissibility of judicial reference on public sector wage calculation under Law No. 153/2017
ICCJ_137606
Inadmissibility of Reference on 25% Higher Education Supplement for Public Officials

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited to establish the obligatory nature of the decision regarding the dismissal of the inadmissible references.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 15 Dosar nr. 1981/1/2024

Ședința din 27 ianuarie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge ca inadmisibile sesizările conexate formulate de Curtea de Apel Braşov - Secţia contencios administrativ şi fiscal în dosarul nr. 3178/62/2023*, de Tribunalul Suceava - Secţia I Civilă în dosarul nr. 3711/86/2023 şi de Tribunalul Călăraşi - Secţia Civilă în dosarul nr. 1272/116/2023, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea chestiunilor de drept privind interpretarea şi aplicarea dispozițiilor art. 15l din Anexa nr. VI din Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017 cu referire la acordarea sporului la salariul de bază/solda de funcţie de până la 25%, pentru exercitarea unei funcţii cu acces la informaţii clasificate din clasa secret de stat.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 27 ianuarie 2025.