Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_222133 AI generated

Admissibility of extraordinary reference on single financial operation for wage differences under Emergency Governmental Ordinance No. 3/2019

Case Number ICCJ_222133
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the reference for a definitive interpretation submitted by the Constanţa County Court. The dispute concerned whether unpaid wage differences resulting from the recalculation of allowances based on a specific reference salary could be paid in full through a single financial operation, challenging the interpretation of Article 1 of Emergency Governmental Ordinance No. 3/2019. The Court determined that the submission did not meet the procedural requirements for a binding interpretation under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, leaving the lower court to resolve the matter without a definitive legal interpretation from the supreme judicial body.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of extraordinary reference on single financial operation for wage differences under Emergency Governmental Ordinance No. 3/2019: The dispute concerned whether unpaid wage differences resulting from the recalculation of allowances based on a specific reference salary could be paid in full through a single financial operation, challenging the interpretation of Article 1 of Emergency Governmental Ordinance No. 3/2019. The Court determined that the submission did not meet the procedural requirements for a binding interpretation under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, leaving the lower court to resolve the matter without a definitive legal interpretation from the supreme judicial body.

Keywords

AI generated
salary recalculation emergency ordinance procedural requirement matter in dispute Civil Procedure Code unpaid salary

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the court's decision on the inadmissibility of the reference for a definitive interpretation.
AI generated
ICCJ_232198
Admissibility of reference for preliminary ruling on base salary calculation for public officials under Emergency Government Ordinance 128/2023
ICCJ_213697
Admissibility of preliminary reference on emergency ordinances derogating from public sector salary framework
ICCJ_222137
Admissibility of preliminary reference on calculation basis for 2% daily allowance under emergency ordinance
ICCJ_220713
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on effective date of public sector salary indemnity calculation under OUG 130/2021 and Law 103/2023
Decizia nr. 149/2025
Reference inadmissible for lacking a true question of law on public sector salary calculation under conflicting emergency orders

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the court's decision on the inadmissibility of the reference for a definitive interpretation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 14 Dosar nr. 1795/1/2024

Ședința din 27 ianuarie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge ca inadmisibilă sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Constanţa - Secţia I civilă privind dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Dacă, în interpretarea art. 1 al Ordonanţei de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 3/2019, plata diferenţelor salariale restante stabilite prin acte administrative ale ordonatorilor de credite rezultate din recalcularea indemnizaţiei prin aplicarea V.R.S.-ului de 605,225 se poate face integral printr-o singură operaţiune financiară”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 27 ianuarie 2025.