Admissibility of including temporary 2020 emergency salary increases in the military pension calculation base
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice, sitting as the panel for resolving questions of law, dismissed as inadmissible a reference for preliminary ruling submitted by the Court of Appeal of Suceava concerning a civil dispute regarding the calculation basis of a military pension. The dispute centered on whether gross sums granted as salary increases during the period of March to June 2020, pursuant to specific provisions in Decrees No. 195/2020 and No. 240/2020 and Emergency Government Ordinance No. 70/2020, could be included in the pension calculation base under Law No. 223/2015, read in relation to Article 4, point 8 of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 147/2020. By rejecting the referral on grounds of inadmissibility, the Supreme Court declined to issue a binding interpretation on this specific legal issue, leaving the reference unaddressed at the cassation level.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of including temporary 2020 emergency salary increases in the military pension calculation base: The dispute centered on whether gross sums granted as salary increases during the period of March to June 2020, pursuant to specific provisions in Decrees No. 195/2020 and No. 240/2020 and Emergency Government Ordinance No. 70/2020, could be included in the pension calculation base under Law No. 223/2015, read in relation to Article 4, point 8 of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 147/2020. By rejecting the referral on grounds of inadmissibility, the Supreme Court declined to issue a binding interpretation on this specific legal issue, leaving the reference unaddressed at the cassation level.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited as the procedural basis for the decision being obligatory for the referring court.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr. 4 Dosar nr. 2117/1/2024
Ședința din 20 ianuarie 2025
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Suceava – Secţia I civilă, în Dosarul nr. 1.296/40/2023, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:
„Posibilitatea includerii în baza de calcul a pensiei militare stabilite conform dispozițiilor Legii nr. 223/2015 a sumelor brute acordate cu titlu de majorare salarială conform art. 32 alin. (2) din Anexa 1 din Decretul nr. 195/2020 şi art. 47 alin. (2) din Anexa 1 din Decretul nr. 240/2020 şi art. 7 din Ordonanța de urgență a Guvernului nr. 70/14.05.2020 din perioada martie-iunie 2020, prin raportare la dispozițiile art. 4 pct. 8 din Ordonanța de urgență a Guvernului nr. 147/27.08.2020”.
Obligatorie potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 20 ianuarie 2025.