Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_222078 AI generated

Admissibility of including temporary 2020 emergency salary increases in the military pension calculation base

Case Number ICCJ_222078
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, sitting as the panel for resolving questions of law, dismissed as inadmissible a reference for preliminary ruling submitted by the Court of Appeal of Suceava concerning a civil dispute regarding the calculation basis of a military pension. The dispute centered on whether gross sums granted as salary increases during the period of March to June 2020, pursuant to specific provisions in Decrees No. 195/2020 and No. 240/2020 and Emergency Government Ordinance No. 70/2020, could be included in the pension calculation base under Law No. 223/2015, read in relation to Article 4, point 8 of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 147/2020. By rejecting the referral on grounds of inadmissibility, the Supreme Court declined to issue a binding interpretation on this specific legal issue, leaving the reference unaddressed at the cassation level.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of including temporary 2020 emergency salary increases in the military pension calculation base: The dispute centered on whether gross sums granted as salary increases during the period of March to June 2020, pursuant to specific provisions in Decrees No. 195/2020 and No. 240/2020 and Emergency Government Ordinance No. 70/2020, could be included in the pension calculation base under Law No. 223/2015, read in relation to Article 4, point 8 of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 147/2020. By rejecting the referral on grounds of inadmissibility, the Supreme Court declined to issue a binding interpretation on this specific legal issue, leaving the reference unaddressed at the cassation level.

Keywords

AI generated
temporary pension reference for a preliminary ruling calculation of salary grounds for cassation pension increase emergency government ordinance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited as the procedural basis for the decision being obligatory for the referring court.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited as the procedural basis for the decision being obligatory for the referring court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 4 Dosar nr. 2117/1/2024

Ședința din 20 ianuarie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Suceava – Secţia I civilă, în Dosarul nr. 1.296/40/2023, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Posibilitatea includerii în baza de calcul a pensiei militare stabilite conform dispozițiilor Legii nr. 223/2015 a sumelor brute acordate cu titlu de majorare salarială conform art. 32 alin. (2) din Anexa 1 din Decretul nr. 195/2020 şi art. 47 alin. (2) din Anexa 1 din Decretul nr. 240/2020 şi art. 7 din Ordonanța de urgență a Guvernului nr. 70/14.05.2020 din perioada martie-iunie 2020, prin raportare la dispozițiile art. 4 pct. 8 din Ordonanța de urgență a Guvernului nr. 147/27.08.2020”.

Obligatorie potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 20 ianuarie 2025.