Interpretation of "illicitly obtained revenues" in commercial suspension fines under the market products and services ordinance
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice, acting as the panel for the resolution of legal questions, admitted the preliminary reference requests from the Court of Appeal of Galati and the Court of Appeal of Sibiu, establishing a mandatory interpretation that resolves the disputed legal issue for all pending cases. The dispute centered on the civil and administrative contentious proceedings regarding commercial contraventions, specifically requiring clarification on the calculation of the fine for the offense of trading after the suspension of commercial activity. The court held that the phrase "illicitly obtained revenues" in Article 73, paragraph 23 of Government Ordinance No. 99/2000 regarding the commercialization of products and services on the market, is interpreted to refer exclusively to the gross revenues realized from commercial activity between the date of the suspension of commercial activity and the moment the contravention was detected.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Interpretation of "illicitly obtained revenues" in commercial suspension fines under the market products and services ordinance: The dispute centered on the civil and administrative contentious proceedings regarding commercial contraventions, specifically requiring clarification on the calculation of the fine for the offense of trading after the suspension of commercial activity. The court held that the phrase "illicitly obtained revenues" in Article 73, paragraph 23 of Government Ordinance No. 99/2000 regarding the commercialization of products and services on the market, is interpreted to refer exclusively to the gross revenues realized from commercial activity between the date of the suspension of commercial activity and the moment the contravention was detected.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is mandatory and obligatory for the referring courts.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr. 116 Dosar nr. 1386/1/2024
Ședința de la 9 decembrie 2024
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Admite sesizările formulate de Tribunalul Galați - Secția contencios administrativ și fiscal în Dosarul nr. 202/233/2022 şi de Tribunalul Sibiu - Secția a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ și fiscal în dosarele nr. 120/306/2022 și nr. 9.546/306/2022, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:
În interpretarea şi aplicarea prevederilor art. 73 pct. 23 din Ordonanța Guvernului nr. 99/2000 privind comercializarea produselor şi serviciilor de piaţă, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, sintagma „veniturile realizate ilicit” se referă la veniturile brute realizate din activitatea comercială desfăşurată între data suspendării activităţii comerciale şi momentul constatării contravenţiei.
Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 9 decembrie 2024.