Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_220673 AI generated

Conflict between ministerial orders and emergency ordinances on entitlement to military food rations and supplements

Case Number ICCJ_220673
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, sitting as the Full Bench for the resolution of legal issues, dismissed as inadmissible the referral for a preliminary ruling submitted by two appellate courts. The dispute concerned a conflict in administrative and fiscal litigation regarding whether military personnel were entitled to specific food rations and supplements based on Ministerial Orders or whether stricter fiscal-budgetary measures under Government Emergency Ordinances took precedence. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural inadmissibility of the referral, resolved pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which renders the decision obligatory.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Conflict between ministerial orders and emergency ordinances on entitlement to military food rations and supplements: The dispute concerned a conflict in administrative and fiscal litigation regarding whether military personnel were entitled to specific food rations and supplements based on Ministerial Orders or whether stricter fiscal-budgetary measures under Government Emergency Ordinances took precedence. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural inadmissibility of the referral, resolved pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which renders the decision obligatory.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural orders military personnel civil dispute fiscal law preliminary ruling procedure entitlement to benefits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited to establish that the decision is obligatory for all courts, serving as the procedural basis for the final disposition of the referrals.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 4684/2023
Challenging state of emergency military order on movement restrictions: scope of ministerial delegation and proportionality of fundamental rights limitations
Decizia nr. 939/2023
Negative jurisdictional conflict over classification of a ministerial order granting military rank as administrative act versus labor law dispute
Decizia nr. 1101/2010
Challenging national defense ministerial orders: inadmissibility due to late pre-litigation complaint and res judicata
Decizia nr. 424/2025
Admissibility of preliminary ruling referral for cumulative entitlement to food allowance and diurnal allowance during judicial secondment
ICCJ_220711
Preliminary rulings on military mission allowances and prescription inadmissible

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited to establish that the decision is obligatory for all courts, serving as the procedural basis for the final disposition of the referrals.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 99 Dosar nr. 2004/1/2024

Ședința din 25 noiembrie 2024

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibile, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Brașov -Secția contencios administrativ şi fiscal în Dosarul nr. 3.836/62/2022 şi sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Ploiești - Secția de contencios administrativ şi fiscal în Dosarul nr. 4.591/105/2022, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Dacă norma de hrană 6 şi norma de hrană 12 sub forma suplimentului B este datorată în baza ordinelor ministrului apărării naţionale nr. 97/2018, nr. 83/2023, nr. 78/2020 şi nr. 35/2022 sau se impune aplicarea cu prioritate a dispoziţiilor din ordonanţele de urgenţă ale Guvernului nr. 114/2018 privind instituirea unor măsuri în domeniul investiţiilor publice şi a unor măsuri fiscal-bugetare, modificarea şi completarea unor acte normative şi prorogarea unor termene, nr. 1/2020 privind unele măsuri fiscal-bugetare şi pentru modificarea şi completarea unor acte normative, nr. 130/2021 privind unele măsuri fiscal-bugetare, prorogarea unor termene, precum şi pentru modificarea şi completarea unor acte normative şi nr. 168/2022 privind unele măsuri fiscal-bugetare, prorogarea unor termene, precum şi pentru modificarea şi completarea unor acte normative”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 25 noiembrie 2024.