Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_220670 AI generated

Admissibility of preliminary ruling on salary coefficient for legal staff in national authority

Case Number ICCJ_220670
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the referral for a preliminary ruling as inadmissible, thereby rejecting the request for a binding legal interpretation and leaving the lower court's position without further instruction. The dispute concerned a labor law issue regarding the application of a specific multiplication coefficient (23.00) under Emergency Government Ordinance No. 27/2006 for legal personnel within the National Authority for Citizenship who hold management positions and are assimilated to judges and prosecutors. The decision is grounded in Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, serving as the procedural basis for the court’s mandatory rejection of the referral due to its inadmissibility, without substantively addressing the merit of the salary coefficient calculation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of preliminary ruling on salary coefficient for legal staff in national authority: The dispute concerned a labor law issue regarding the application of a specific multiplication coefficient (23.00) under Emergency Government Ordinance No. 27/2006 for legal personnel within the National Authority for Citizenship who hold management positions and are assimilated to judges and prosecutors. The decision is grounded in Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, serving as the procedural basis for the court’s mandatory rejection of the referral due to its inadmissibility, without substantively addressing the merit of the salary coefficient calculation.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary decision preliminary ruling procedure calculation of salary Civil Procedure Code grounds for cassation personnel administration
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is mandatory, following the dismissal of the preliminary ruling request as inadmissible.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 96 Dosar nr. 1996/1/2024

Ședința din 25 noiembrie 2024

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Bucureşti – Secţia a VIII-a Conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în Dosarul nr. 33129/3/2023, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Aplicarea coeficientului de multiplicare 23,00, prevăzut la lit. A din Anexa Ordonanţei de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 27/2006, corespunzător funcţiei de conducere deţinute de personalul de specialitate juridică asimilat judecătorilor si procurorilor din cadrul Autorităţii Naţionale Pentru Cetăţenie”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 25 noiembrie 2024.