Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_220665 AI generated

Judicial pension calculation: exclusion of pre-magistrate lawyer service periods after 2024

Case Number ICCJ_220665
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania, in its Plenary for Resolving Questions of Law, admitted a preliminary reference from the Bucharest Tribunal and definitively held that the period during which a magistrate-assistant served as a lawyer cannot be counted toward pension entitlement calculation for service periods after January 1, 2024. This decision resolves a dispute regarding the interpretation of judicial status laws and pension regulations, specifically addressing the exclusivity of pension rights for the post-2024 period under the amended Legal Framework. The court’s ruling is based on Article 86 of Law No. 303/2004 (republicated), Article 282(3) of Law No. 303/2022 in relation to Article 211(1) of the same law as modified by Law No. 282/2023, and the Fiscal Code, establishing that the relevant period is excluded from pension calculations except for the specific derogation provided in Article II of Law No. 282/2023; the judgment is mandatory under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 86 din Legea nr. 303/2004, art. 282 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 303/2022, art. 211 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 303/2022, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Judicial pension calculation: exclusion of pre-magistrate lawyer service periods after 2024: This decision resolves a dispute regarding the interpretation of judicial status laws and pension regulations, specifically addressing the exclusivity of pension rights for the post-2024 period under the amended Legal Framework. The court’s ruling is based on Article 86 of Law No. 303/2004 (republicated), Article 282(3) of Law No. 303/2022 in relation to Article 211(1) of the same law as modified by Law No. 282/2023, and the Fiscal Code, establishing that the relevant period is excluded from pension calculations except for the specific derogation provided in Article II of Law No. 282/2023; the judgment is mandatory under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Keywords

AI generated
pension calculation magistrate judicial law derogation from law civil status preliminary ruling procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 86 din Legea nr. 303/2004
Substantive provision regarding the judicial status whose interpretation determines the entitlement to pension for the period of service as a lawyer.
art. 282 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 303/2022
Substantive provision regarding the judicial status applied in conjunction with the previous law to define the pension calculation rules.
art. 211 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 303/2022
Provision defining the scope of application of the new status law, used to establish the temporal boundary for pension entitlements.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural provision establishing the binding nature of the decision issued by the complete for resolving questions of law.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 86 din Legea nr. 303/2004

Substantive provision regarding the judicial status whose interpretation determines the entitlement to pension for the period of service as a lawyer.

art. 282 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 303/2022

Substantive provision regarding the judicial status applied in conjunction with the previous law to define the pension calculation rules.

art. 211 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 303/2022

Provision defining the scope of application of the new status law, used to establish the temporal boundary for pension entitlements.

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural provision establishing the binding nature of the decision issued by the complete for resolving questions of law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 90 Dosar nr. 2069/1/2024

Ședința din 25 noiembrie 2024

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Bucureşti - Secţia a VIII-a conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în Dosarul nr. 8.553/3/2024, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:

În interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 86 din Legea nr. 303/2004 privind statutul judecătorilor şi procurorilor, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare şi art. 282 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 303/2022 privind statutul judecătorilor şi procurorilor, prin raportare la art. 211 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 303/2022, modificată prin Legea nr. 282/2023 pentru modificarea şi completarea unor acte normative din domeniul pensiilor de serviciu şi a Legii nr. 227/2015 privind Codul fiscal, perioada în care magistratul-asistent a îndeplinit funcţia de avocat nu poate fi valorificată la stabilirea dreptului la pensie după data de 01.01.2024, cu excepţia situaţiei derogatorii stabilite prin Art. II din Legea nr. 282/2023.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 25 noiembrie 2024.