Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_220661 AI generated

Referral for preliminary ruling on debtor status acquisition via late payment penalties in civil enforcement dismissed as inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_220661
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral for a preliminary ruling on points of law submitted by the Argeș County Court. The dispute concerned civil enforcement proceedings, specifically whether an entity that was not a party to the original judgment constituting the enforceable title could acquire debtor status solely through a claim for late payment penalties under Article 906(2) and (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, and whether the resulting court order is final or subject to appeal. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural requirement under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs the admissibility of referrals for the resolution of points of law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Referral for preliminary ruling on debtor status acquisition via late payment penalties in civil enforcement dismissed as inadmissible: The dispute concerned civil enforcement proceedings, specifically whether an entity that was not a party to the original judgment constituting the enforceable title could acquire debtor status solely through a claim for late payment penalties under Article 906(2) and (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, and whether the resulting court order is final or subject to appeal. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural requirement under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs the admissibility of referrals for the resolution of points of law.

Keywords

AI generated
civil judgment referral order order for enforcement preliminary ruling procedure legal status late objection to debt enforcement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is obligatory.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 6/2023
Inadmissible preliminary ruling on validity deadlines for successive garnishment orders in enforcement proceedings
ICCJ_141002
Creditor Distribution Challenge Declared Inadmissible for Preliminary Ruling
Decizia nr. 39/2021
Inadmissibility of preliminary reference on whether final penalty sums can be fixed when debtor performs within statutory three-month deadline under Civil Procedure Code
ICCJ_178528
Preliminary ruling referral inadmissible for lack of jurisdiction under Article 521(3) Civil Procedure Code.
Decizia nr. 60/2020
Preliminary ruling referral held inadmissible; insolvency priority-ranking questions deemed case-specific application, not legal interpretation.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is obligatory.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 93 Dosar nr. 1951/1/2024

Ședința din 25 noiembrie 2024

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Argeş – Secţia civilă, în dosarul nr. 198/216/2021, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarele chestiuni de drept:

„1. Se poate aprecia că o entitate care nu a fost parte în dosarul în care s-a pronunţat o hotărâre ce constituie titlu executoriu, hotărâre a cărei neexecutare generează declanşarea procedurii reglementate de dispoziţiile art. 906 alin. (2) şi (3) din Codul de procedură civilă, dobândeşte calitatea de debitor în sensul acestor dispoziţii legale strict ca efect al formulării unei cereri de chemare în judecată având ca obiect obligarea la plata penalităţilor de întârziere?

2. Indiferent de soluţia adoptată de instanţa de fond, încheierea pronunţată în condiţiile art. 906 alin. (2) din Codul de procedură civilă îşi păstrează caracterul definitiv şi raportat la această entitate sau este supusă apelului?”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 25 noiembrie 2024.