Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_220627 AI generated

Recalculation of partial early retirement pensions using incompatible statutory provisions

Case Number ICCJ_220627
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (ICCJ) admitted the appeal in the interest of law filed by the leadership of the Galati Court of Appeal, establishing a mandatory uniform interpretation of the law. The dispute concerned the validity of recalculating a partial early retirement pension originally granted under specific conditions, challenging whether the pension could be recalculated using different statutory provisions within the same law. The court ruled that it is legally impermissible to recalculate a partial early retirement pension established under Article 65(1) and (4) of Law No. 263/2010 regarding the public pension system by applying the provisions of Article 65(5) of the same act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 65 alin. (1), (4) şi (5) din Legea nr. 263/2010, art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă; Recalculation of partial early retirement pensions using incompatible statutory provisions: The dispute concerned the validity of recalculating a partial early retirement pension originally granted under specific conditions, challenging whether the pension could be recalculated using different statutory provisions within the same law. The court ruled that it is legally impermissible to recalculate a partial early retirement pension established under Article 65(1) and (4) of Law No. 263/2010 regarding the public pension system by applying the provisions of Article 65(5) of the same act.

Keywords

AI generated
recalculation of pension early retirement statutory basis interpretation of a judgment calculation of interest cumulative pension entitlement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 65 alin. (1), (4) şi (5) din Legea nr. 263/2010
Substantive provision providing the uniform interpretation that recalculating a partial early retirement pension established under paragraphs (1) and (4) is not possible by applying the provisions of paragraph (5).
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural provision cited to establish the binding nature of the decision on the lower court.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 89/2024
Recalculation of special-condition pensions: Partially allowed reference establishing validity of retroactive benefits, rejecting inadmissible portion concerning Law No. 351/2022 scope
Decizia nr. 3291/2013
Competence for pension recalculation appeals: applicability of new jurisdiction rules under Law 263/2010 at time of filing
Decizia nr. 299/2025
Pension recalculation eligibility under Law 263/2010 and cumulative application of penal interest and inflation indexation for delayed monetary obligations
ICCJ_146165
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on pension recalculation under Article 1691 Law 263/2010
ICCJ_213619
Partial early pension recalculation query inadmissible for preliminary ruling

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 65 alin. (1), (4) şi (5) din Legea nr. 263/2010

Substantive provision providing the uniform interpretation that recalculating a partial early retirement pension established under paragraphs (1) and (4) is not possible by applying the provisions of paragraph (5).

art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural provision cited to establish the binding nature of the decision on the lower court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru soluționarea recursului în interesul legii

Minuta deciziei nr. 21 Dosar nr. 2024/1/2024

Şedinţa din 18 noiembrie 2024

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite recursul în interesul legii formulat de Colegiul de conducere al Curţii de Apel Galaţi şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:

În interpretarea şi aplicarea unitară a art. 65 alin. (1), (4) şi (5) din Legea nr. 263/2010 privind sistemul unitar de pensii publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, nu este posibilă recalcularea pensiei anticipate parţiale stabilită în condiţiile art. 65 alin. (1) şi (4) din Legea nr. 263/2010 prin aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 65 alin. (5) din acelaşi act normativ.

Obligatorie, potrivit art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 18 noiembrie 2024.