Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_219282 AI generated

Request for preliminary ruling on salary grade correspondence under collective bargaining agreement declared inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_219282
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Bucharest Court of Appeal, meaning no interpretation of the disputed legal issue was provided and the procedure remains pending at the referring court level. The dispute concerned the validity of the correspondence between salary grades as modified by a unit-level collective bargaining agreement for a national rail transport company for the years 2023-2024. The Court rejected the submission based on the admissibility requirements for preliminary rulings under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, failing to meet the procedural thresholds necessary for the Supreme Court to address the specific labor law interpretation regarding the collective agreement's amendments.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Request for preliminary ruling on salary grade correspondence under collective bargaining agreement declared inadmissible: The dispute concerned the validity of the correspondence between salary grades as modified by a unit-level collective bargaining agreement for a national rail transport company for the years 2023-2024. The Court rejected the submission based on the admissibility requirements for preliminary rulings under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, failing to meet the procedural thresholds necessary for the Supreme Court to address the specific labor law interpretation regarding the collective agreement's amendments.

Keywords

AI generated
collective bargaining preliminary ruling procedure preliminary decision rulings providing an interpretation Civil Procedure Code procedural requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision declaring the preliminary ruling request inadmissible is binding.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision declaring the preliminary ruling request inadmissible is binding.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 65 Dosar nr. 1740/1/2024

Ședința din 28 octombrie 2024

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Bucureşti – Secţia a VIII-a conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în dosarul nr. 2140/3/2024, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept: „corespondenţa claselor de salarizare, astfel cum au fost modificate conform contractului colectiv de muncă la nivel de unitate al Societăţii Naţionale de Transport Feroviar de Călători “C.F.R. Călători” S.A. pe anii 2023-2024 înregistrat la Inspectoratul Teritorial de Muncă al municipiului Bucureşti sub nr. 388/13.12.2023”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 28 octombrie 2024.