Request for preliminary ruling on salary grade correspondence under collective bargaining agreement declared inadmissible
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Bucharest Court of Appeal, meaning no interpretation of the disputed legal issue was provided and the procedure remains pending at the referring court level. The dispute concerned the validity of the correspondence between salary grades as modified by a unit-level collective bargaining agreement for a national rail transport company for the years 2023-2024. The Court rejected the submission based on the admissibility requirements for preliminary rulings under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, failing to meet the procedural thresholds necessary for the Supreme Court to address the specific labor law interpretation regarding the collective agreement's amendments.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Request for preliminary ruling on salary grade correspondence under collective bargaining agreement declared inadmissible: The dispute concerned the validity of the correspondence between salary grades as modified by a unit-level collective bargaining agreement for a national rail transport company for the years 2023-2024. The Court rejected the submission based on the admissibility requirements for preliminary rulings under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, failing to meet the procedural thresholds necessary for the Supreme Court to address the specific labor law interpretation regarding the collective agreement's amendments.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited in the dispositive to establish that the decision declaring the preliminary ruling request inadmissible is binding.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr. 65 Dosar nr. 1740/1/2024
Ședința din 28 octombrie 2024
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Bucureşti – Secţia a VIII-a conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în dosarul nr. 2140/3/2024, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept: „corespondenţa claselor de salarizare, astfel cum au fost modificate conform contractului colectiv de muncă la nivel de unitate al Societăţii Naţionale de Transport Feroviar de Călători “C.F.R. Călători” S.A. pe anii 2023-2024 înregistrat la Inspectoratul Teritorial de Muncă al municipiului Bucureşti sub nr. 388/13.12.2023”.
Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 28 octombrie 2024.