Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_219281 AI generated

Reference on retroactive effect of constitutional decision for age-limit allowance declared inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_219281
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the reference for a preliminary ruling on a question of law submitted by the Bucharest Court of Appeal, thereby leaving the lower court to resolve the case without binding guidance from the supreme judicial body. The dispute concerned labor law and social insurance, specifically whether Constitutional Court Decision No. 261/2022 produces legal effects during the period between February 27, 2021, and June 10, 2021, for an employee who had not initiated litigation regarding their right to an age-limit allowance under Article 49 of Law No. 96/2006 prior to the publication of that constitutional decision. The procedural basis for the dismissal was Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs the admissibility requirements for references to the High Court's Panel for Resolving Questions of Law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 49 din Legea nr. 96/2006, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Reference on retroactive effect of constitutional decision for age-limit allowance declared inadmissible: The dispute concerned labor law and social insurance, specifically whether Constitutional Court Decision No. 261/2022 produces legal effects during the period between February 27, 2021, and June 10, 2021, for an employee who had not initiated litigation regarding their right to an age-limit allowance under Article 49 of Law No. 96/2006 prior to the publication of that constitutional decision. The procedural basis for the dismissal was Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs the admissibility requirements for references to the High Court's Panel for Resolving Questions of Law.

Keywords

AI generated
reference for a preliminary ruling constitutional limits preliminary decision in social insurance social allowance procedural rights age of majority

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 49 din Legea nr. 96/2006
261/2022 în intervalul 27.02.2021-10.06.2021, în cazul concret al reclamantului, care nu sesizase instanţa de judecată cu o acţiune referitoare la dreptul său la plata indemnizaţiei pentru limită de vârstă, prevăzută de art. 49 din Legea nr.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited as the procedural basis for declaring the reference for a preliminary ruling inadmissible.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 281/2025
Extending the effects of a subsequent constitutional ruling on identical age-limit allowance abrogations to an earlier period covered by a distinct unconstitutional law.
Decizia nr. 4000/2023
Retroactive application of Constitutional Court invalidation of age-limit allowance suspension statute to pending administrative litigation.
ICCJ_222140
Recalculation of parliamentary age-limit indemnity after Constitutional Court suspension.
Decizia nr. 2109/2024
Cease payment of parliamentary age-limit allowance: unconstitutional abrogation of statutory benefit and reinstatement via constitutional court intervention
Decizia nr. 3153/2023
Age-limit allowance suspension annulled after unconstitutional law declaration, with back pay ordered

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited as the procedural basis for declaring the reference for a preliminary ruling inadmissible.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 64 Dosar nr. 1738/1/2024

Ședința din 28 octombrie 2024

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Bucureşti – Secţia a VIII-a conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în Dosarul nr. 3.570/99/2023, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Produce efecte Decizia Curţii Constituţionale nr. 261/2022 în intervalul 27.02.2021-10.06.2021, în cazul concret al reclamantului, care nu sesizase instanţa de judecată cu o acţiune referitoare la dreptul său la plata indemnizaţiei pentru limită de vârstă, prevăzută de art. 49 din Legea nr. 96/2006, până la momentul publicării Deciziei Curţii Constituţionale nr. 261/2022 în Monitorul Oficial?

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 28 octombrie 2024.