Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_219260 AI generated

Branch of foundation: whether the branch's board of directors must be compositionally distinct from the parent foundation's board under Art. 18(2) of Gov. Ord. 26/2000

Case Number ICCJ_219260
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected as inadmissible the preliminary reference submitted by the Ialomița Tribunal regarding the interpretation of the governing body composition for a branch of a foundation. The dispute concerned whether, under Article 18(2) of Government Ordinance No. 26/2000, the board of directors of a branch established by a foundation must be distinct in its composition from the board of directors of the parent foundation. By ruling the submission inadmissible, the court did not resolve the substantive legal question, thereby leaving the lower court to determine the issue without a binding interpretation from the supreme court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Branch of foundation: whether the branch's board of directors must be compositionally distinct from the parent foundation's board under Art. 18(2) of Gov. Ord. 26/2000: The dispute concerned whether, under Article 18(2) of Government Ordinance No. 26/2000, the board of directors of a branch established by a foundation must be distinct in its composition from the board of directors of the parent foundation. By ruling the submission inadmissible, the court did not resolve the substantive legal question, thereby leaving the lower court to determine the issue without a binding interpretation from the supreme court.

Keywords

AI generated
foundation legal entity reference for a preliminary ruling preliminary question constitution and composition e-government

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the final order to establish that the court's decision resolving the preliminary reference is mandatory for the requesting tribunal.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 59/2024
Preliminary ruling inadmissibility due to lack of dependency of the legal question on the special appeal grounds
Decizia nr. 3577/2018
Territorial jurisdiction for dissolution of a foundation branch: application of public-order rules to the seat of the principal entity
Decizia nr. 3371/2012
Competence for challenging foundation board appointments: private entity lacking statutory public utility status subject to district court jurisdiction rather than administrative litigation.
ICCJ_86971
Eligibility of NGO funding applications under O.G. 26/2000: Excess of power in requiring new constitutive acts for entities established under Law 21/1924
Decizia nr. 5044/2003
Territorial jurisdiction for foundation internal disputes: exclusive competence of the court at the county foundation's seat under Law No. 146/2002

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the final order to establish that the court's decision resolving the preliminary reference is mandatory for the requesting tribunal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 59 Dosar nr. 1569/1/2024

Ședința din 21 octombrie 2024

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Ialomiţa – Secţia civilă, în dosarul nr. 325/98/2024, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

Dispoziţiile art. 18 alin. (2) din Ordonanţa Guvernului nr. 26/2000 cu privire la asociaţii şi fundaţii, aprobată cu modificări şi completări prin Legea nr. 246/2005, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, potrivit cărora filiala este condusă de un consiliu director propriu, se interpretează în sensul că respectivul consiliu director al filialei trebuie să fie distinct (în privinţa componenţei) de consiliul director al fundaţiei care a constituit respectiva filială?

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 21 octombrie 2024.