Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_219257 AI generated

Pension contribution periods for medium disability: assimilated and pre-2001 seniority included in full stage

Case Number ICCJ_219257
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, acting as the complete panel for resolving legal questions, issued a binding preliminary ruling that admitted the referral from the Bucharest Court of Appeal and established that, under Article 58(c) of Law No. 263/2010, the full contribution period required for medium-disability beneficiaries includes both assimilated periods defined in Article 49(1)(b) and (c) and supplementary seniority periods granted for work in Group I or II prior to April 1, 2001, pursuant to Article 17(1). The dispute concerned the interpretation of pension legislation regarding which specific periods count toward the mandatory contribution threshold for disability pensions, specifically whether non-contributory or special-condition work periods are eligible for inclusion in the calculation. The decisive legal basis is the joint application of Articles 58(c), 49(1)(b)-(c), and 17(1) of Law No. 263/2010 on the unified public pension system, clarifying that these diverse categories of service time collectively satisfy the statutory requirement for a complete contribution stage.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 58 lit. c) din Legea nr. 263/2010, art. 17 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010, art. 49 alin. (1) lit. b) şi c) din Legea nr. 263/2010, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Pension contribution periods for medium disability: assimilated and pre-2001 seniority included in full stage: 263/2010, the full contribution period required for medium-disability beneficiaries includes both assimilated periods defined in Article 49(1)(b) and (c) and supplementary seniority periods granted for work in Group I or II prior to April 1, 2001, pursuant to Article 17(1). The dispute concerned the interpretation of pension legislation regarding which specific periods count toward the mandatory contribution threshold for disability pensions, specifically whether non-contributory or special-condition work periods are eligible for inclusion in the calculation. The decisive legal basis is the joint application of Articles 58(c), 49(1)(b)-(c), and 17(1) of Law No. 263/2010 on the unified public pension system, clarifying that these diverse categories of service time collectively satisfy the statutory requirement for a complete contribution stage.

Keywords

AI generated
disability pension calculation assimilated contribution period supplementary pension defined contribution system transfer of pension rights seniority

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 58 lit. c) din Legea nr. 263/2010
Main ground for the verdict, defining the requirement for a full contribution period in the calculation of pensions for beneficiaries with medium disability.
art. 17 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010
Substantive provision cited to include supplementary seniority periods for work in Group I or II prior to April 1, 2001.
art. 49 alin. (1) lit. b) şi c) din Legea nr. 263/2010
Substantive provision cited to include specific assimilated periods in the total contribution stage.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural rule establishing that the decision is binding on all courts.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 58 lit. c) din Legea nr. 263/2010

Main ground for the verdict, defining the requirement for a full contribution period in the calculation of pensions for beneficiaries with medium disability.

art. 49 alin. (1) lit. b) şi c) din Legea nr. 263/2010

Substantive provision cited to include specific assimilated periods in the total contribution stage.

art. 17 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010

Substantive provision cited to include supplementary seniority periods for work in Group I or II prior to April 1, 2001.

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural rule establishing that the decision is binding on all courts.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 51 Dosar nr. 1607/1/2024

Ședința din 21 octombrie 2024

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Braşov – Secţia civilă, în dosarul nr. 1734/62/2023, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile și, în consecință, stabilește că:

În interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 58 lit. c) din Legea nr. 263/2010 privind sistemul unitar de pensii publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, în calculul stagiului complet de cotizare, ce trebuie realizat de către asiguraţii cu handicap mediu, intră şi perioadele asimilate prevăzute de art. 49 alin. (1) lit. b) şi c) din Legea nr. 263/2010 sau perioada suplimentară la vechimea în muncă, acordată pentru perioadele realizate în grupa I sau în grupa a II-a de muncă, în baza legislaţiei anterioare datei de 1 aprilie 2001, la care face referire art. 17 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 21 octombrie 2024.