Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_205364 AI generated

ApPLICABILITY OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE COMPLAINT WITHDRAWAL RIGHTS TO CONTRAVENTIONAL COMPLAINTS

Case Number ICCJ_205364
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court admitted the appeal in the interest of the law filed by the Court of Appeal leadership and established binding jurisprudence, ruling that the filing of a contraventional complaint does not exclude the application of the right to withdraw the complaint under Article 204(1) of the Civil Procedure Code. The dispute concerned the procedural rights available to a plaintiff or complainant in contravention cases, specifically whether specific regulatory provisions barred the withdrawal of the claim. The decisive legal basis is the interpretation of Article 31(1) of Government Emergency Ordinance No. 2/2001 regarding the legal regime of contraventions, read in conjunction with Article 204(1) of the Civil Procedure Code, confirming that general procedural rights regarding the withdrawal of complaints remain applicable unless explicitly derogated by specific statutory law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 204 alin. (1) din Codul de procedură civilă, art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă; ApPLICABILITY OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE COMPLAINT WITHDRAWAL RIGHTS TO CONTRAVENTIONAL COMPLAINTS: The dispute concerned the procedural rights available to a plaintiff or complainant in contravention cases, specifically whether specific regulatory provisions barred the withdrawal of the claim. The decisive legal basis is the interpretation of Article 31(1) of Government Emergency Ordinance No. 2/2001 regarding the legal regime of contraventions, read in conjunction with Article 204(1) of the Civil Procedure Code, confirming that general procedural rights regarding the withdrawal of complaints remain applicable unless explicitly derogated by specific statutory law.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code withdrawal of civil claim procedural rights emergency ordinance established right right to remain

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 204 alin. (1) din Codul de procedură civilă
The procedural rule applied in the dispositive to confirm its mandatory applicability in cases involving the filing of a contraventional complaint.
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă
The procedural basis cited to establish that the interpretation provided is binding and mandatory for all courts.
AI generated
ICCJ_211751
Applicability of civil amendment deadlines to contravenial complaints after the 15-day filing period
Decizia nr. 2193/2019
Withdrawal of unconstitutionality challenge to Civil Procedure Code jurisdiction rules in negative conflict of jurisdiction over administrative act annulment
Decizia nr. 1221/2023
Withdrawal from civil proceedings as dispositive act superseding merits review under Civil Procedure Code
Decizia nr. 279/2022
Withdrawal of complaint regarding procedural delay under Article 523 Civil Procedure Code
ICCJ_192242
Admissibility of extraordinary review challenge concerning whether contravention deadline limits post-service amendment of complaint to allege new illegality grounds

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 31 alin. (1) din Ordonanța Guvernului nr. 2/2001 privind regimul juridic al contravențiilor, aprobată cu modificări și completări prin Legea nr. 180/2002

The main substantive provision interpreted by the court to establish that the filing of a contraventional complaint does not exclude the application of general procedural rights regarding the withdrawal of complaints.

art. 204 alin. (1) din Codul de procedură civilă

The procedural rule applied in the dispositive to confirm its mandatory applicability in cases involving the filing of a contraventional complaint.

art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă

The procedural basis cited to establish that the interpretation provided is binding and mandatory for all courts.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru soluționarea recursului în interesul legii

Minuta deciziei nr. 16 Dosar nr. 1577/1/2023

Şedinţa din 18 septembrie 2023

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite recursul în interesul legii declarat de Colegiul de conducere al Curţii de Apel Cluj.

În interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 31 alin. (1) din Ordonanța Guvernului nr. 2/2001 privind regimul juridic al contravențiilor, aprobată cu modificări și completări prin Legea nr. 180/2002, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, stabileşte că :

În ipoteza formulării unei plângeri contravenţionale, dispoziţiile legale mai sus invocate nu exclud de la aplicare prevederile art. 204 alin. (1) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 18 septembrie 2023.