Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_203011 AI generated

Preliminary ruling referral on compensation point valuation method inadmissible.

Case Number ICCJ_203011
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie) dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Constanța Court of Appeal seeking a preliminary ruling on the question of whether, in litigation where a claimant seeks to compel the National Commission for Property Compensation to issue a compensation decision with a point count for an unsolved file, the compensation value in points should be set by the current market value, the notarial grid for the year before the action or judgment, or the 2013 notarial grid; the dismissal leaves the lower court's decision in force. The dispute concerned a civil case involving the valuation method for property compensation points under restitution legislation. The court based its decision on procedural admissibility grounds, finding the referral did not meet the conditions for a preliminary ruling under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, without addressing the substantive merits of the valuation question.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Preliminary ruling referral on compensation point valuation method inadmissible: The dispute concerned a civil case involving the valuation method for property compensation points under restitution legislation. The court based its decision on procedural admissibility grounds, finding the referral did not meet the conditions for a preliminary ruling under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, without addressing the substantive merits of the valuation question.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary decision preliminary ruling procedure value in dispute civil judgment restitution of property market value of property

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to declare the referral binding, in accordance with the legal provision on the effects of a preliminary ruling decision.
AI generated
ICCJ_187724
Restitution referral on Law 165/2013 valuation held inadmissible.
ICCJ_138455
Preliminary ruling referral on price reduction for bundled immovables dismissed as inadmissible
ICCJ_201038
Preliminary ruling referral inadmissible for lacking genuine interpretive difficulty; prior land restitution decisions stand.
Decizia nr. 82/2021
Claimant cannot obtain retroactive revaluation under newer notarial grid; referral for preliminary ruling inadmissible.
ICCJ_230685
Preliminary ruling referral inadmissible; prior salary-law decision stands

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to declare the referral binding, in accordance with the legal provision on the effects of a preliminary ruling decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 48 Dosar nr. 1179/1/2023

Ședința din 26 iunie 2023

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Constanţa – Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 7366/118/2019, pentru pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile, cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

În cazul litigiilor în care reclamantul solicită obligarea Comisiei Naţionale pentru Compensarea Imobilelor la soluţionarea dosarului prin emiterea unei decizii de compensare care să conţină numărul de puncte, atunci când aceasta nu a soluţionat dosarul până la data introducerii acţiunii şi nici ulterior, valoarea despăgubirilor exprimată în numărul de puncte se stabileşte în funcţie de valoarea actuală de piaţă a imobilului, valoarea imobilului conform grilei notariale aferente anului anterior sesizării instanţei sau pronunţării hotărârii în primă instanţă ori valoarea imobilului conform grilei notariale aferente anului 2013?

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 26 iunie 2023.