Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_202999 AI generated

Binding interpretation requiring transfer of civil cases at appellate or cassation stage to be decided by the specific judicial panel prescribed for that procedural level

Case Number ICCJ_202999
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, acting as the panel for appeals in the interest of the law, admitted the appeal filed by the leadership of the Cluj Court of Appeal and issued a binding, mandatory interpretation regarding procedural composition. The dispute concerned the correct judicial panel required to adjudicate a request for the transfer (strămutare) of a civil case that was already in the appellate or cassation stage. The court established that such transfer requests, which fall within the jurisdiction of the court of appeal, must be decided by the specific composition of judges prescribed by law for the respective procedural stage (appeal or cassation), rather than a default panel. This decision is grounded in Articles 142 and 144 of the Civil Procedure Code, read in conjunction with Article 59 of Law No. 304/2022 on the organization of the judiciary, and serves to ensure uniform application of the law under Article 517(4) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 59 din Legea nr. 304/2022, art. 142 şi art. 144 din Codul de procedură civilă, art. 59 din Legea nr. 304/2022 privind organizarea judiciară, art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă; Binding interpretation requiring transfer of civil cases at appellate or cassation stage to be decided by the specific judicial panel prescribed for that procedural level: The dispute concerned the correct judicial panel required to adjudicate a request for the transfer (strămutare) of a civil case that was already in the appellate or cassation stage. The court established that such transfer requests, which fall within the jurisdiction of the court of appeal, must be decided by the specific composition of judges prescribed by law for the respective procedural stage (appeal or cassation), rather than a default panel. This decision is grounded in Articles 142 and 144 of the Civil Procedure Code, read in conjunction with Article 59 of Law No. 304/2022 on the organization of the judiciary, and serves to ensure uniform application of the law under Article 517(4) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial law article of civil procedure uniform interpretation procedural issues preliminary ruling procedure interpretation of a judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 59 din Legea nr. 304/2022
144 din Codul de procedură civilă, coroborate cu cele ale art. 59 din Legea nr. 304/2022 privind organizarea judiciară, stabileşte că:
art. 142 şi art. 144 din Codul de procedură civilă
Main ground for the decision, as the court establishes the uniform interpretation and application of these articles regarding the composition of the court for transfer requests.
art. 59 din Legea nr. 304/2022 privind organizarea judiciară
Substantive provision cited in the dispositive to establish the legal basis for the composition of the court in conjunction with the procedural code.
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to declare the interpretation mandatory.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 142 şi art. 144 din Codul de procedură civilă

Main ground for the decision, as the court establishes the uniform interpretation and application of these articles regarding the composition of the court for transfer requests.

art. 59 din Legea nr. 304/2022 privind organizarea judiciară

Substantive provision cited in the dispositive to establish the legal basis for the composition of the court in conjunction with the procedural code.

art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to declare the interpretation mandatory.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru soluționarea recursului în interesul legii

Minuta deciziei nr. 10 Dosar nr. 1023/1/2023

Ședința din 19 iunie 2023

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite recursul în interesul legii formulat de Colegiul de conducere al Curţii de Apel Cluj şi, în consecinţă:

În interpretarea şi aplicarea unitară a dispozițiilor art. 142 şi art. 144 din Codul de procedură civilă, coroborate cu cele ale art. 59 din Legea nr. 304/2022 privind organizarea judiciară, stabileşte că:

Cererea de strămutare, de competența curții de apel, a unui proces aflat în etapa apelului sau a recursului se soluționează în compunerea prevăzută de lege pentru stadiul procesual respectiv.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 19 iunie 2023.