Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_202199 AI generated

Admissibility of preliminary ruling on applicability of non-voluntary execution provisions to civil restitution of harm

Case Number ICCJ_202199
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the request for a preliminary ruling as inadmissible, leaving the lower court to proceed without the requested legal clarification. The dispute concerned a procedural issue in criminal law, specifically whether the provisions of Article 10, paragraph 11 of Law No. 241/2005 (concerning the coverage of harm/prejudice) apply to situations where compensation is achieved through involuntary activity or forced execution proceedings. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the inadmissibility of the referral under Article 477 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which governs the binding nature and procedural requirements for pre-alimentary decisions by the High Court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Admissibility of preliminary ruling on applicability of non-voluntary execution provisions to civil restitution of harm: „Dacă dispoziţiile art. 10 alin. 11 din Legea nr. 241/2005 sunt aplicabile în ipoteza acoperirii prejudiciului ca urmare a unei activităţi nevoluntare, respectiv a unei proceduri de executare silită?”.

Keywords

AI generated
code of criminal procedure preliminary decision preliminary ruling procedure request to proceed with execution restitution and compensation civil dispute
AI generated
ICCJ_169585
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on complex merger of penalties in multiple post-execution recidivism and concurrence scenarios
ICCJ_153042
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on separation of nullity orders from merits in criminal trials
ICCJ_178583
Admissibility of preliminary ruling request on statutory composition of penal appellate courts
ICCJ_220719
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on systemic impunity, statutory interpretation of concurrence of criminal laws, and compatibility of secret statute interruption with criminal law foreseeability.
ICCJ_119323
Inadmissibility of request for preliminary ruling on jurisdiction and appealability of revision against Preliminary Chamber Judge orders

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

R O M Â N I A

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

COMPLETUL PENTRU DEZLEGAREA UNOR CHESTIUNI DE DREPT ÎN MATERIE PENALĂ

Minuta deciziei nr. 39 Dosar nr. 672/1/2023

Şedinţa din data de 15 mai 2023

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel București - Secţia a II-a penală, în dosarul nr. 1120/122/2019, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Dacă dispoziţiile art. 10 alin. 11 din Legea nr. 241/2005 sunt aplicabile în ipoteza acoperirii prejudiciului ca urmare a unei activităţi nevoluntare, respectiv a unei proceduri de executare silită?”.

Obligatorie de la data publicării în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, potrivit art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 15 mai 2023.