Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_202195 AI generated

Applicability of Labor Code suspension pay rules to public servants under the Administrative Code

Case Number ICCJ_202195
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Romania's Plenary Bench for Resolving Questions of Law admitted the referral and established that the payment of salary rights for suspension periods for public servants is governed by Article 52(2) of the Labor Code in conjunction with Article 367 of the Administrative Code, following the abrogation of specific provisions in Law No. 188/1999. The dispute concerned the interpretation of Article 513(1)(l) of the Administrative Code regarding the legal regime of suspension for public employees, arising from a request by the Cluj Court of Appeal to resolve a question of law in an administrative and fiscal litigation case. The decisive legal basis is the interplay between the post-abrogation vacuum in public sector employment law and the general provisions of the Labor Code as incorporated by the Administrative Code for suspension scenarios.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 86 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 188/1999, art. 513 alin. (1) lit. l) din Codul administrativ, art. 52 alin. (2) din Codul muncii, art. 367 din Codul administrativ, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Applicability of Labor Code suspension pay rules to public servants under the Administrative Code: 188/1999. The dispute concerned the interpretation of Article 513(1)(l) of the Administrative Code regarding the legal regime of suspension for public employees, arising from a request by the Cluj Court of Appeal to resolve a question of law in an administrative and fiscal litigation case. The decisive legal basis is the interplay between the post-abrogation vacuum in public sector employment law and the general provisions of the Labor Code as incorporated by the Administrative Code for suspension scenarios.

Keywords

AI generated
public employment law suspension period fiscal law source of law interpretation of a judgment established right

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 86 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 188/1999
l) din Codul administrativ, în contextul abrogării prevederilor art. 86 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 188/1999, acordarea drepturilor salariale aferente perioadei de suspendare se realizează în condiţiile art.
art. 513 alin. (1) lit. l) din Codul administrativ
Primary substantive provision interpreted to determine the applicable legal regime for salary rights during suspension.
art. 52 alin. (2) din Codul muncii
Substantive provision identified as the source of rules governing the payment of salary rights during the suspension period.
art. 367 din Codul administrativ
Provision cited in conjunction with the Labor Code to apply labor law norms to the specific administrative context of public service suspension.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural provision cited to establish that the decision is binding for all courts.
AI generated
ICCJ_129080
Constitutional invalidation of Labor Code suspension rule sustains employees' pay claims in pending cases
Decizia nr. 379/2025
Public official suspension rights: scope of salary entitlements under Law 188/1999 regarding seniority, vouchers, and leave
Decizia nr. 35/2023
Acquitted civil servant entitled to back pay for lawful suspension period under Labor Code gap-filling.
Decizia nr. 676/2012
Salary rights during criminal suspension of public officials: Inapplicability of 2011 resumption norms to interim compensation
Decizia nr. 758/2008
Suspended payment of statutory civil servant leave bonuses under annual budget laws

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 513 alin. (1) lit. l) din Codul administrativ

Primary substantive provision interpreted to determine the applicable legal regime for salary rights during suspension.

art. 52 alin. (2) din Codul muncii

Substantive provision identified as the source of rules governing the payment of salary rights during the suspension period.

art. 367 din Codul administrativ

Provision cited in conjunction with the Labor Code to apply labor law norms to the specific administrative context of public service suspension.

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural provision cited to establish that the decision is binding for all courts.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 35 Dosar nr. 513/1/2023

Ședința din 15 mai 2023

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Cluj - Secţia a III-a contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 230/84/2022, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:

În interpretarea şi aplicarea prevederilor art. 513 alin. (1) lit. l) din Codul administrativ, în contextul abrogării prevederilor art. 86 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 188/1999, acordarea drepturilor salariale aferente perioadei de suspendare se realizează în condiţiile art. 52 alin. (2) din Codul muncii, în raport cu prevederile art. 367 din Codul administrativ.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 15 mai 2023.