Inadmissibility of referral on whether Decree-Law 118/1990 extends veteran status to soldiers captured by Soviet forces after August 1944
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the referral for a preliminary ruling as inadmissible, thereby denying the request to resolve the legal question and leaving the underlying civil dispute to proceed without a binding uniform interpretation from the supreme court. The referral was initiated by a court of appeal to determine whether the legal provisions of Decree-Law No. 118/1990, which conferred veteran or combatant status for service during World War II, extended to individuals who had been conscripted into the Hungarian army and subsequently captured as prisoners of war by the Soviet forces after August 23, 1944. The decisive procedural basis for the dismissal was the court's determination that the submitted question did not meet the admissibility requirements for a preliminary ruling under the relevant provisions of the Civil Procedure Code, specifically Article 521(3), preventing the establishment of a new jurisprudence on this specific interpretive issue.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Inadmissibility of referral on whether Decree-Law 118/1990 extends veteran status to soldiers captured by Soviet forces after August 1944: The referral was initiated by a court of appeal to determine whether the legal provisions of Decree-Law No. 118/1990, which conferred veteran or combatant status for service during World War II, extended to individuals who had been conscripted into the Hungarian army and subsequently captured as prisoners of war by the Soviet forces after August 23, 1944. The decisive procedural basis for the dismissal was the court's determination that the submitted question did not meet the admissibility requirements for a preliminary ruling under the relevant provisions of the Civil Procedure Code, specifically Article 521(3), preventing the establishment of a new jurisprudence on this specific interpretive issue.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedProcedural basis cited to declare the preliminary ruling referral inadmissible.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr. 27 Dosar nr. 184/1/2023
Şedinţa de la 3 aprilie 2023
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Harghita – Secția civilă, prin Încheierea nr. 1 din 10 ianuarie 2023, pronunțată în Dosarul nr. 1.322/96/2022, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:
„Dacă prevederile art. 1 alin. (2) lit. b) din Decretul-lege nr. 118/1990 au în vedere şi persoanele înrolate în armata maghiară, care au fost constituite în prizonieri de război de către armata sovietică după data de 23 august 1944?”
Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 3 aprilie 2023.