Enforceable title status of utility invoices issued under public service delegation contracts
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the connected referral cases filed by the Bucharest Court of Appeal as inadmissible, resulting in the lower court retaining jurisdiction to resolve the underlying civil disputes without a binding preliminary ruling. The court refused to address the procedural legal question of whether a fiscal invoice issued by a public utility operator to a public authority under a service management delegation contract constitutes an enforceable title for the purpose of executing civil proceedings. The decision is grounded in the procedural framework of Articles 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code and the substantive provisions of Article 42(61) of Law No. 51/2006 on Public Utility Services, establishing that the referred questions did not meet the admissibility criteria required for a preliminary ruling by the full panel for legal interpretation.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Enforceable title status of utility invoices issued under public service delegation contracts: The court refused to address the procedural legal question of whether a fiscal invoice issued by a public utility operator to a public authority under a service management delegation contract constitutes an enforceable title for the purpose of executing civil proceedings. The decision is grounded in the procedural framework of Articles 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code and the substantive provisions of Article 42(61) of Law No. 51/2006 on Public Utility Services, establishing that the referred questions did not meet the admissibility criteria required for a preliminary ruling by the full panel for legal interpretation.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited as the procedural basis establishing the binding nature of the court's decision.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr. 15 Dosar nr. 24/1/2023
Ședința din 13 martie 2023
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Respinge, ca inadmisibile, sesizările conexate formulate de Tribunalul Bucureşti - Secţia a VI-a civilă, în dosarele nr. 23648/299/2021 şi nr. 9626/299/2021, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:
Art. 42 alin. (61) din Legea serviciilor comunitare de utilități publice nr. 51/2006, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, poate fi interpretat în sensul că și factura fiscală emisă de către operator față de autoritatea publică, în baza unui contract de delegare a gestiunii unui serviciu de utilitate publică, are caracter de titlu executoriu?
Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 13 martie 2023.