Unitary interpretation of daily allowance purpose for personnel on missions abroad under Government Decision No. 1,086/2004
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Cassation and Justice admitted a lawfulness appeal filed by the appellate court's leadership and established that, for the unitary interpretation and application of Article 1(1) of Government Decision No. 1,086/2004 (regarding specific bonuses and daily allowances for personnel on missions abroad), the purpose of the daily allowance is to compensate the inconveniences arising from the risks faced by personnel in operational zones; the court rejected the remaining submissions as inadmissible, and the decision is mandatory under Article 517(4) of the Civil Procedure Code. The dispute concerned the legal interpretation of compensation norms for state employees deployed on international missions, specifically defining the function of the daily allowance within the framework of unpublished government regulations. The decisive legal basis was the unitary interpretation of Article 1(1) of Government Decision No. 1,086/2004, clarifying that the allowance serves a compensatory purpose linked to operational risks rather than representing a standard wage component.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă; Unitary interpretation of daily allowance purpose for personnel on missions abroad under Government Decision No. 1,086/2004: 1,086/2004 (regarding specific bonuses and daily allowances for personnel on missions abroad), the purpose of the daily allowance is to compensate the inconveniences arising from the risks faced by personnel in operational zones; the court rejected the remaining submissions as inadmissible, and the decision is mandatory under Article 517(4) of the Civil Procedure Code. The dispute concerned the legal interpretation of compensation norms for state employees deployed on international missions, specifically defining the function of the daily allowance within the framework of unpublished government regulations. The decisive legal basis was the unitary interpretation of Article 1(1) of Government Decision No. 1,086/2004, clarifying that the allowance serves a compensatory purpose linked to operational risks rather than representing a standard wage component.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory nature of the court's decision.
Full text
R O M Â N I A
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru soluționarea recursului în interesul legii
Minuta deciziei nr. 24 Dosar nr. 1847/1/2022
Şedinţa de la 14 noiembrie 2022
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
D E C I D E :
Admite recursul în interesul legii declarat de Colegiul de conducere al Curţii de Apel Braşov şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:
În interpretarea şi aplicarea unitară a dispoziţiilor art. 1 alin. (1) din Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 1.086/2004 pentru stabilirea sporurilor specifice şi a drepturilor de diurnă, cazare şi hrană cuvenite personalului participant la misiuni în afara teritoriului statului român, nepublicată în Monitorul Oficial al României, scopul diurnei este compensarea inconvenientelor rezultate din riscurile la care este supus personalul participant la misiunile în afara teritoriului statului român, în zonele de operații.
Respinge sesizarea, în rest, ca inadmisibilă.
Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 14 noiembrie 2022.