Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 96/2022 AI generated

Appeal suspended for non-appearance; prior ruling stands.

Case Number Încheierea nr. 96/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (5-judge panel) suspended the appeal proceedings due to the absence of both parties at the hearing, ordering the suspension of the case under Article 411(1)(2) of the Civil Procedure Code; no substantive ruling was made, so the appealed decision (a prior administrative and fiscal chamber ruling) remains in force. The dispute involved a procedural challenge—an appeal against a prior decision—where neither party appeared despite proper citation and did not request a judgment in absentia. The legal basis was the mandatory suspension rule (Article 411(1)(2) C. proc. civ.) triggered when all legally cited parties fail to appear at the hearing; the order is final.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 411 alin. (1) pct. 2 C. proc. civ; Appeal suspended for non-appearance; prior ruling stands: The dispute involved a procedural challenge—an appeal against a prior decision—where neither party appeared despite proper citation and did not request a judgment in absentia. The legal basis was the mandatory suspension rule (Article 411(1)(2) C. proc. civ.) triggered when all legally cited parties fail to appear at the hearing; the order is final.

Keywords

AI generated
judgment in absentia hearing of the parties article of civil procedure standing to appeal procedural orders challenge of administrative decisions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 411 alin. (1) pct. 2 C. proc. civ
Main ground for suspending the appeal because neither party appeared, as cited in the dispositive.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 1755/2020
Mandatory suspension of proceedings for non-appearance without request for judgment in absentia under Article 411(1)(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure
Decizia nr. 6295/2021
Mandatory judicial suspension upon non-appearance of both parties and absence of written request for judgment in absentia
Decizia nr. 381/2025
Suspension upheld: appeal against procedural stay for non-appearance rejected.
Încheierea nr. 91/2022
Suspension of appeal due to failure of cited parties to appear at hearing
Decizia nr. 1529/2018
Appeal against suspension of proceedings for mutual absence of parties: validity of suspension absent request for judgment in absentia under Article 411 C. proc. civ.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 411 alin. (1) pct. 2 C. proc. civ.

Main ground for suspending the appeal because neither party appeared, as cited in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Constată că procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită, iar părţile nu s-au prezentat la strigarea cauzei şi nu au solicitat judecarea în lipsă, astfel cum permit dispoziţiile art. 411 alin. (1) pct. 2 teza finală din C. proc. civ.

În aceste condiţii, sunt incidente dispoziţiile art. 411 alin. (1) pct. 2 teza întâi din C. proc. civ., conform cărora "Judecătorul va suspenda judecata […] când niciuna dintre părţi, legal citate, nu se înfăţişează la strigarea cauzei".

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Suspendă judecata recursului declarat de A. împotriva Deciziei nr. 214 din 19 ianuarie 2022 pronunţate de Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie, secţia de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în Dosarul nr. x/2019, în temeiul art. 411 alin. (1) pct. 2 C. proc. civ.

Definitivă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 16 mai 2022.

GGC - NN