Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Încheierea nr. 86/2022 AI generated

Sporadic suspension of cassation proceedings due to absence of all parties

Case Number Încheierea nr. 86/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Cassation and Justice suspended the judgment on the appeal against Decision No. 5627/2021 of the Supreme Court, leaving the underlying decision in force pending resumption of proceedings, as neither party appeared at the hearing nor requested a default judgment. The case involved a recusal or procedural challenge regarding an appeal filed by a limited liability company against a previous Supreme Court decision in an administrative and fiscal dispute from 2018. The court applied Article 411, paragraph (1), point 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, mandating the suspension of judgment when legally cited parties fail to appear and do not opt for a default ruling.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 411 alin. (1) pct. 2 C. proc. civ; Sporadic suspension of cassation proceedings due to absence of all parties: 5627/2021 of the Supreme Court, leaving the underlying decision in force pending resumption of proceedings, as neither party appeared at the hearing nor requested a default judgment. The case involved a recusal or procedural challenge regarding an appeal filed by a limited liability company against a previous Supreme Court decision in an administrative and fiscal dispute from 2018. The court applied Article 411, paragraph (1), point 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, mandating the suspension of judgment when legally cited parties fail to appear and do not opt for a default ruling.

Keywords

AI generated
pending proceedings civil judgment challenge of administrative decisions suspension of bankruptcy proceedings limited liability company judicial review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 411 alin. (1) pct. 2 C. proc. civ.

Provision applied in the dispositive to suspend the judgment of the appeal because none of the legally cited parties appeared at the hearing.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Constată că procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită, iar părţile nu s-au prezentat la strigarea cauzei şi nu au solicitat judecarea în lipsă, astfel cum permit dispoziţiile art. 411 alin. (1) pct. 2 teza finală din C. proc. civ.

În aceste condiţii, sunt incidente dispoziţiile art. 411 alin. (1) pct. 2 teza întâi din C. proc. civ., conform cărora "Judecătorul va suspenda judecata […] când niciuna dintre părţi, legal citate, nu se înfăţişează la strigarea cauzei".

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Suspendă judecata recursului declarat de recurenta S.C. A. S.R.L. împotriva Deciziei nr. 5627 din 17 noiembrie 2021 pronunţate de Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie, secţia de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în Dosarul nr. x/2018, în temeiul art. 411 alin. (1) pct. 2 C. proc. civ.

Definitivă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 16 mai 2022.

GGC - NN