Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_192651 AI generated

Standing of political party to annul local urbanism act under combined interpretation of administrative jurisdiction and environmental protection laws

Case Number ICCJ_192651
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Bucharest Court of Appeal, meaning no preliminary ruling was issued on the merits. The dispute concerned whether a political party possesses standing to bring an administrative action to annul an urbanism act issued by a local public authority. The referral sought to resolve a legal question regarding the interpretation of the party's procedural capacity to act as a plaintiff. The decisive legal basis involved the combined interpretation of the provisions on the scope of administrative jurisdiction and standing (Article 2(1)(a) and (p) of Law No. 554/2004), the status and definitions in the Law on Political Parties (No. 14/2003), and the specific environmental protection conditions under Emergency Government Ordinance No. 195/2005.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Standing of political party to annul local urbanism act under combined interpretation of administrative jurisdiction and environmental protection laws: The dispute concerned whether a political party possesses standing to bring an administrative action to annul an urbanism act issued by a local public authority. The referral sought to resolve a legal question regarding the interpretation of the party's procedural capacity to act as a plaintiff. The decisive legal basis involved the combined interpretation of the provisions on the scope of administrative jurisdiction and standing (Article 2(1)(a) and (p) of Law No. 554/2004), the status and definitions in the Law on Political Parties (No. 14/2003), and the specific environmental protection conditions under Emergency Government Ordinance No. 195/2005.

Keywords

AI generated
political parties public authorities interpretation of laws standing to appeal legal status legal capacity to act
AI generated
Decizia nr. 65/2022
Referral for preliminary ruling on political party standing in urban planning annulment declared inadmissible
Decizia nr. 1043/2003
Appeal by municipality lacking standing to challenge annulment of building permit.
Decizia nr. 2180/2022
Councillor's Party Expulsion Challenge Revived; Inadmissibility Ruling Quashed and Remanded
Decizia nr. 4575/2008
Validity of administrative claim filed by local council as civil plaintiff: lack of legal capacity and exclusive representation rights of the mayor under Local Government Law
Decizia nr. 1798/2008
Administrative jurisdiction: Inadmissibility of actions challenging generic political policy rather than specific administrative acts

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 65 Dosar nr. 1319/1/2022

Şedinţa de la 24 octombrie 2022

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel București - Secția a VIII-a contencios administrativ şi fiscal, prin Încheierea din 29 martie 2022, pronunțată în Dosarul nr. 20.661/3/2020, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

Dacă, din interpretarea coroborată a dispoziţiilor art. 2 alin. (1) lit. a) şi p) din Legea contenciosului administrativ nr. 554/2004, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, art. 1 şi art. 2 din Legea partidelor politice nr. 14/2003, republicată, raportat la dispoziţiile art. 5 lit. d) din Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 195/2005 privind protecţia mediului, aprobată cu modificări şi completări prin Legea nr. 265/2006, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, se deduce calitatea procesuală activă a reclamantului partid politic în formularea acţiunii având ca obiect anularea actului de urbanism emis de autoritatea publică locală?

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 24 octombrie 2022.