Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_192636 AI generated

Pension calculation scope: eligibility of pre-2001 income contributions for pension rights under Law 263/2010

Case Number ICCJ_192636
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the appeal in the interest of the law filed by the Board of the Cluj Court of Appeal. The dispute concerned the interpretation of Article 165(2) of Law No. 263/2010, specifically whether pension calculations must include all effectively received salary income from before April 1, 2001, for which social insurance contributions were paid, regardless of whether such income was permanent or included in the pension base under prior legislation. The Court rejected the challenge, upholding the validity of the lower court's stance, with the decision rendered mandatory under Article 517(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 165 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 263/2010, art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă; Pension calculation scope: eligibility of pre-2001 income contributions for pension rights under Law 263/2010: The dispute concerned the interpretation of Article 165(2) of Law No. 263/2010, specifically whether pension calculations must include all effectively received salary income from before April 1, 2001, for which social insurance contributions were paid, regardless of whether such income was permanent or included in the pension base under prior legislation. The Court rejected the challenge, upholding the validity of the lower court's stance, with the decision rendered mandatory under Article 517(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Keywords

AI generated
pension calculation scope of the legislation Civil Procedure Code interpretation of a judgment social insurance dispute employment subject to social contributions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 165 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 263/2010
„Interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 165 alin.
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is mandatory and binding, as required by the procedural rule for appeals in the interest of the law.
AI generated
ICCJ_198151
Recurs in interest of the law inadmissible: prior unification decisions resolve pension contribution calculation issue under Law 263/2010
ICCJ_178652
Pre-pension calculation inclusion of pre-2001 non-wage earnings proven by employer certificates under Law 263/2010
ICCJ_81567
Inclusion of pre-2001 income in pension point calculations based on social security contribution payment and prior legal basis inclusion.
Decizia nr. 299/2025
Pension recalculation eligibility under Law 263/2010 and cumulative application of penal interest and inflation indexation for delayed monetary obligations
ICCJ_142107
Pension bonus eligibility for pre-2001 rights calculated using statutory length of service

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is mandatory and binding, as required by the procedural rule for appeals in the interest of the law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru soluționarea recursului în interesul legii

Minuta deciziei nr. 22 Dosar nr. 1544/1/2022

Şedinţa din 17 octombrie 2022

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibil, recursul în interesul legii formulat de Colegiul de conducere al Curţii de Apel Cluj ce vizează următoarea problemă de drept:

„Interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 165 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 263/2010 privind sistemul unitar de pensii publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, în sensul de a stabili dacă la calculul drepturilor de pensie trebuie avute în vedere toate veniturile salariale efectiv încasate, anterior datei de 1 aprilie 2001, cu privire la care au fost achitate contribuţiile de asigurări sociale, independent de caracterul permanent sau nepermanent al acestor venituri şi de faptul că au făcut sau nu parte din baza de calcul al pensiilor conform legislaţiei anterioare datei de 1 aprilie 2001”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 17 octombrie 2022.