Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_190278 AI generated

Admissibility of preliminary ruling request on valuation of remunerated mandate contract subject matter

Case Number ICCJ_190278
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, acting through the full panel for resolving legal questions, rejected as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by a lower civil court. The dispute concerned a civil procedure issue specifically regarding the determination of the "value of the subject matter" in a lawsuit challenging a remuneration-based mandate contract, where the referring court sought clarification on whether the dispute value should be calculated based on the claimant’s underlying receivable or the value of the mandatary’s fee. The decisive legal basis for the rejection was the application of Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs the admissibility requirements for referring specific legal questions to the highest court for a binding interpretation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of preliminary ruling request on valuation of remunerated mandate contract subject matter: The dispute concerned a civil procedure issue specifically regarding the determination of the "value of the subject matter" in a lawsuit challenging a remuneration-based mandate contract, where the referring court sought clarification on whether the dispute value should be calculated based on the claimant’s underlying receivable or the value of the mandatary’s fee. The decisive legal basis for the rejection was the application of Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs the admissibility requirements for referring specific legal questions to the highest court for a binding interpretation.

Keywords

AI generated
matter in dispute preliminary contract contract of mandate determination of value preliminary ruling procedure Civil Procedure Code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Explicitly cited in the dispositive as the basis for declaring the preliminary ruling request inadmissible.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 41/2022
Referral on mandate contract valuation ruled inadmissible for raising no novel legal issue.
Decizia nr. 1254/2016
Contractual debt claim inadmissible on appeal due to value threshold under transitional procedural rules
Decizia nr. 14/2023
Admissibility of preliminary ruling referrals on attorney mandate limits and ex officio nullity in low-value proceedings
Decizia nr. 72/2022
Preliminary ruling inadmissible due to settled jurisprudence on budgetary conditioning of unemployment subsidies
ICCJ_229361
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on interpretation of public service delegation allowance conditions and justificatory document requirements under Government Decision No. 714/2018.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Explicitly cited in the dispositive as the basis for declaring the preliminary ruling request inadmissible.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 41 Dosar nr. 795/1/2022

Ședința din 27 iunie 2022

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Buzău - Secţia a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 14029/200/2020, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Dacă valoarea obiectului unui contract de mandat remunerat este reprezentată de valoarea creanţei în vederea recuperării căreia s-a încheiat contractul de mandat sau de valoarea remuneraţiei mandatarului.”

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 27 iunie 2022.