Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_190276 AI generated

Presumption of liability for failure to surrender accounting documents in insolvency proceedings

Case Number ICCJ_190276
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the appeal in the interest of the law filed by the leadership board of the Court of Appeal of Iași, establishing a binding national jurisprudential principle regarding corporate insolvency proceedings. The dispute concerned the procedural mechanism for holding a debtor liable for the failure to surrender accounting documents to the appointed insolvency practitioner, specifically challenging the uniform interpretation of evidentiary standards in such cases. The Court ruled that under Article 169(1)(d), second sentence, of Law No. 85/2014, the failure of the defendant to hand over accounting documents following a prior notification gives rise to a relative presumption (*presumpție relativă*) that all conditions for attracting patrimonial liability for this specific offense are met, thereby shifting the evidentiary burden and facilitating the imposition of liability without the creditor needing to prove each element individually.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 169 alin. (1) lit. d) teza a doua din Legea nr. 85/2014, art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă; Presumption of liability for failure to surrender accounting documents in insolvency proceedings: The dispute concerned the procedural mechanism for holding a debtor liable for the failure to surrender accounting documents to the appointed insolvency practitioner, specifically challenging the uniform interpretation of evidentiary standards in such cases. The Court ruled that under Article 169(1)(d), second sentence, of Law No. 85/2014, the failure of the defendant to hand over accounting documents following a prior notification gives rise to a relative presumption (*presumpție relativă*) that all conditions for attracting patrimonial liability for this specific offense are met, thereby shifting the evidentiary burden and facilitating the imposition of liability without the creditor needing to prove each element individually.

Keywords

AI generated
insolvency surrender of documents notarial liability duty to surrender ancillary earnings duty to keep accounts concurrence of liabilities

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 169 alin. (1) lit. d) teza a doua din Legea nr. 85/2014
The substantive legal provision whose uniform interpretation was established by the court in the final order, defining the relative presumption of liability for failing to surrender accounting documents.
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă
The procedural rule cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory binding force of the decision.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 169 alin. (1) lit. d) teza a doua din Legea nr. 85/2014

The substantive legal provision whose uniform interpretation was established by the court in the final order, defining the relative presumption of liability for failing to surrender accounting documents.

art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă

The procedural rule cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory binding force of the decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru soluționarea recursului în interesul legii

Minuta deciziei nr. 14 Dosar nr. 893/1/2022

Şedinţa din 27 iunie 2022

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite recursul în interesul legii formulat de Colegiul de conducere al Curții de Apel Iaşi și, în consecință, stabileşte că:

În interpretarea şi aplicarea unitară a dispoziţiilor art. 169 alin. (1) lit. d) teza a doua din Legea nr. 85/2014 privind procedurile de prevenire a insolvenţei şi de insolvenţă, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, în cazul în care pârâtul nu predă documentele contabile practicianului în insolvenţă, după prealabila notificare, se prezumă relativ întrunirea tuturor condiţiilor necesare atragerii răspunderii patrimoniale pentru fapta prevăzută de art. 169 alin. (1) lit. d) din aceeași lege.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 27 iunie 2022.