Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_188378 AI generated

Pension contribution period revision query deemed inadmissible for preliminary ruling.

Case Number ICCJ_188378
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Court of Appeal Galați seeking a preliminary ruling on whether, under Article 107(1) of Law No. 263/2010 on the unified public pension system, the full contribution period used and uncontested at the time pension rights were established could be modified through revision following a decision in the interest of the law issued by the High Court. The referral was rejected because the question did not meet the statutory admissibility conditions for such a preliminary ruling procedure under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 107 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010; Pension contribution period revision query deemed inadmissible for preliminary ruling: 263/2010 on the unified public pension system, the full contribution period used and uncontested at the time pension rights were established could be modified through revision following a decision in the interest of the law issued by the High Court. The referral was rejected because the question did not meet the statutory admissibility conditions for such a preliminary ruling procedure under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Keywords

AI generated
pension revision contribution period preliminary decision preliminary ruling procedure statutory right article of civil procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 107 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010
În interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 107 alin.
AI generated
ICCJ_171946
Pension-update referral inadmissible; preliminary ruling rejected on procedural grounds.
Decizia nr. 33/2022
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on revising unchallenged pension contribution periods following Supreme Court in-interest-of-law decision
Decizia nr. 279/2025
Pension revision referral dismissed as inadmissible for failing to specify legal provisions and case relevance
ICCJ_213619
Partial early pension recalculation query inadmissible for preliminary ruling
ICCJ_229609
Pension update referral rejected as inadmissible over failure to meet preliminary ruling standards.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 33 Dosar nr. 629/1/2022

Ședința din 6 iunie 2022

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Galaţi - Secţia conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în dosarul nr. 303/121/2021, pentru pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea problemă de drept:

În interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 107 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010 privind sistemul unitar de pensii publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, se poate modifica, pe calea revizuirii, stagiul complet de cotizare utilizat, necontestat la momentul stabilirii drepturilor de pensie, ca urmare a pronunţării unei decizii în interesul legii de către Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie?

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 6 iunie 2022.