Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_187734 AI generated

Cancellation of suspended sentence under Art. 89 Penal Code in subsequent offense during supervision period

Case Number ICCJ_187734
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the request for a prior decision on a matter of law filed by the Cluj County Court. The dispute concerned whether the suspension of the execution of a sentence under Article 89(1) of the Penal Code could be annulled in the specific scenario where the defendant committed a new offense during the supervision period, for which a separate suspension of sentence had already been pronounced. The court determined that the sesion was procedurally invalid and therefore refused to rule on the substantive legal question regarding the compatibility of multiple suspensions, leaving the referring court to resolve the matter under existing procedural norms.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală; Cancellation of suspended sentence under Art. 89 Penal Code in subsequent offense during supervision period: The dispute concerned whether the suspension of the execution of a sentence under Article 89(1) of the Penal Code could be annulled in the specific scenario where the defendant committed a new offense during the supervision period, for which a separate suspension of sentence had already been pronounced. The court determined that the sesion was procedurally invalid and therefore refused to rule on the substantive legal question regarding the compatibility of multiple suspensions, leaving the referring court to resolve the matter under existing procedural norms.

Keywords

AI generated
suspended sentence rule of law matter in dispute procedural rules dismissal during probation e-justice

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală
Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory nature of the decision from the date of its publication in the Official Monitor.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 277/RC/2020
Suspended sentences for minor offenses: conflicting application of Law No. 187/2012 Articles 9 and 22 in revocation of prior conditional suspension
Decizia nr. 14/2003
Recidivism under suspended probation: Revocation of prior conditional sentence and exclusion of detention from unrelated cases in aggregate penalty calculation
ICCJ_128520
Revocation of supervised suspension governed by new Criminal Code after post-suspension offense: preliminary ruling admitted.
ICCJ_133064
Suspended-sentence conviction under old Criminal Code not a ground for automatic termination; preliminary referral inadmissible.
Decizia nr. 76/2003
Wrongful revocation of conditional suspension of prior sentence for post-probation offense and statutory rehabilitation

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală

Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory nature of the decision from the date of its publication in the Official Monitor.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

R O M Â N I A

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

COMPLETUL PENTRU DEZLEGAREA UNOR CHESTIUNI DE DREPT ÎN MATERIE PENALĂ

Minuta deciziei nr.30 Dosar nr. 664/1/2022

Şedinţa din data de 25 mai 2022

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Cluj, Secţia penală prin care se solicită pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

“Dacă, în înţelesul art. 89 alin. (1) din Codul penal, este posibilă anularea amânării aplicării pedepsei, în ipoteza în care, pentru infracţiunea descoperită pe parcursul termenului de supraveghere, s-a pronunţat o soluţie de amânare a aplicării pedepsei”.

Obligatorie de la data publicării în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I-a, potrivit art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 25 mai 2022.