Inadmissibility of post-annulment motion for clarification of judgment dispositive

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible a petition for clarification of the operative part of a prior decision issued by the same court, thereby leaving the original ruling intact and in force. The dispute concerned a procedural motion filed by a party to clarify the dispositive of a judgment rendered in a case pending before the Full Bench for Adjudicating Recourse in the Interest of the Law. The court’s refusal to entertain the clarification request was based on the principle that such petitions are inadmissible in this context, as implied by the procedural framework governing the Supreme Court's specialized bench, while the resulting decision is mandatory pursuant to Article 517(4) of the Civil Procedure Code.