Statutory Cap on Salary Supplements for Judicial Auxiliary Staff Under Framework Law No. 153/2017
Romania (RO)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice, through its United Sections, granted the appeal filed in the interest of the law by the Presiding Council of the Alba Iulia Court of Appeal, establishing a binding mandatory interpretation for all courts. The dispute concerned the statutory calculation of salary supplements for auxiliary staff within judicial courts and prosecutors' offices, specifically addressing whether such payments are exempt from general wage caps. The Court determined that the sum of these specific bonuses must not exceed the maximum limits established for the credit officer responsible for salary disbursement. This ruling provides a uniform legal interpretation of Article 38(3)(a) and 38(6) of Framework Law No. 153/2017 regarding public sector salarization, read in conjunction with Articles 4 and 5 of Section I, Chapter VIII of Annex V, and Article 25 of the same Act, confirming that auxiliary staff remain subject to the aggregate salary ceiling provisions.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă; Statutory Cap on Salary Supplements for Judicial Auxiliary Staff Under Framework Law No. 153/2017: The dispute concerned the statutory calculation of salary supplements for auxiliary staff within judicial courts and prosecutors' offices, specifically addressing whether such payments are exempt from general wage caps. The Court determined that the sum of these specific bonuses must not exceed the maximum limits established for the credit officer responsible for salary disbursement. This ruling provides a uniform legal interpretation of Article 38(3)(a) and 38(6) of Framework Law No. 153/2017 regarding public sector salarization, read in conjunction with Articles 4 and 5 of Section I, Chapter VIII of Annex V, and Article 25 of the same Act, confirming that auxiliary staff remain subject to the aggregate salary ceiling provisions.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory binding nature of the judgment issued by the United Sections.
Full text
R O M Â N I A
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
SECŢIILE UNITE
Completul pentru soluționarea recursului în interesul legii
Minuta deciziei nr. 15 Dosar nr. 1127/1/2021
Şedinţa de la 28 iunie 2021
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
D E C I D E : Admite recursul în interesul legii formulat de Colegiul de conducere al Curţii de Apel Alba Iulia. În interpretarea unitară a dispoziţiilor art. 38 alin. (3) lit. a) şi alin. (6) din Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017 privind salarizarea personalului plătit din fonduri publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, raportate la art. 4 şi 5 din capitolul VIII secţiunea I din anexa nr. V la aceeaşi lege, suma sporurilor acordate personalului auxiliar din cadrul instanţelor judecătoreşti şi al parchetelor de pe lângă acestea nu trebuie să depăşească limita prevăzută de art. 25 din aceeaşi lege, raportată la ordonatorul de credite care stabileşte drepturile salariale. Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă. Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 28 iunie 2021.