Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_175893 AI generated

Cumulability of statutory retirement age reductions under public pension legislation

Case Number ICCJ_175893
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the *recurso in interesul legii* (appeal in the interest of the law) filed by the Administrative College of the Court of Appeal of Braşov, resulting in no change to the lower court’s ruling on the specific legal issue. The dispute concerned the interpretation and uniform application of public pension legislation, specifically whether the reduction of the standard retirement age provided for in Article 58 of Law No. 263/2010 could be cumulated with the reduction regulated by Article 55 of the same law. The Court’s decision was based on the procedural admissibility requirements for appeals in the interest of the law, as mandated by Article 517(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which renders the ruling obligatory for all courts.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 60 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 263/2010, art. 55 din Legea nr. 263/2010, art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă; Cumulability of statutory retirement age reductions under public pension legislation: The dispute concerned the interpretation and uniform application of public pension legislation, specifically whether the reduction of the standard retirement age provided for in Article 58 of Law No. 263/2010 could be cumulated with the reduction regulated by Article 55 of the same law. The Court’s decision was based on the procedural admissibility requirements for appeals in the interest of the law, as mandated by Article 517(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which renders the ruling obligatory for all courts.

Keywords

AI generated
statutory retirement age statutory requirement Roman law rulings providing an interpretation article of civil procedure reduction of disability pension

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 60 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 263/2010
Interpretarea şi aplicarea unitară a dispoziţiilor art. 60 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 263/2010 privind sistemul unitar de pensii publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, în sensul de a se stabili dacă reducerea vârstei standard de pensionare prevăzută de art.
art. 55 din Legea nr. 263/2010
58 poate fi cumulată cu aceea reglementată de art. 55 din Legea nr. 263/2010.
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited to establish the binding nature of the ruling on inadmissibility in the interest of the law.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited to establish the binding nature of the ruling on inadmissibility in the interest of the law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

R O M Â N I A

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

SECŢIILE UNITE

Completul pentru soluționarea recursului în interesul legii

Minuta deciziei nr. 13 Dosar nr. 1238/1/2021

Şedinţa de la 28 iunie 2021

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E :

Respinge, ca inadmisibil, recursul în interesul legii declarat de Colegiul de conducere al Curţii de Apel Braşov, cu privire la următoarea problemă de drept:

Interpretarea şi aplicarea unitară a dispoziţiilor art. 60 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 263/2010 privind sistemul unitar de pensii publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, în sensul de a se stabili dacă reducerea vârstei standard de pensionare prevăzută de art. 58 poate fi cumulată cu aceea reglementată de art. 55 din Legea nr. 263/2010.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 28 iunie 2021.