Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_175892 AI generated

Classification of zonal urban planning approvals as normative administrative acts under Law 350/2001

Case Number ICCJ_175892
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted an appeal in the interest of law and ruled that a local council’s decision approving a zonal urban planning plan constitutes a normative administrative act. This decision was made in a proceeding challenging the legal classification of such municipal instruments, where the dispute centered on whether the act possessed the general and abstract character required to be treated as normative rather than individual. The court based its ruling on the unified interpretation and application of specific provisions of the Law on Territorial Planning and Urbanism, particularly Articles 311, 32(5)(a), 39, 44, 45, 47(1)-(2), 56(1), (4), (6)-(7), and 64(3), in conjunction with Article 66 of the Legislative Technique Law, establishing that these plans meet the statutory criteria for normative administrative acts.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 64 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 350/2001, art. 66 din Legea nr. 24/2000, art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă; Classification of zonal urban planning approvals as normative administrative acts under Law 350/2001: This decision was made in a proceeding challenging the legal classification of such municipal instruments, where the dispute centered on whether the act possessed the general and abstract character required to be treated as normative rather than individual. The court based its ruling on the unified interpretation and application of specific provisions of the Law on Territorial Planning and Urbanism, particularly Articles 311, 32(5)(a), 39, 44, 45, 47(1)-(2), 56(1), (4), (6)-(7), and 64(3), in conjunction with Article 66 of the Legislative Technique Law, establishing that these plans meet the statutory criteria for normative administrative acts.

Keywords

AI generated
urban planning administrative acts territorial law interpretation of the law zoning classification land use regulation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 64 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 350/2001
(1), (4), (6) şi (7) și art. 64 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 350/2001 privind amenajarea teritoriului şi urbanismul, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, raportate la art.
art. 66 din Legea nr. 24/2000
350/2001 privind amenajarea teritoriului şi urbanismul, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, raportate la art. 66 din Legea nr.
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural basis cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory binding nature of the decision issued in the interest of the law.
AI generated
ICCJ_178587
Legal nature of local council approval of Zonal Urban Plan: normative administrative act versus individual act
ICCJ_153559
Scope of contraventional authority to order regularization of unauthorized constructions and compatibility with territorial planning law
Decizia nr. 852/2025
Urban planning authorization: necessity of archaeological review for protected sites and limits of administrative discretion in imposing site-specific conditions
Decizia nr. 5314/2019
Urban project exclusion action dismissed as inadmissible due to lack of specific administrative act or recognized right
Decizia nr. 4120/2022
Competence for issuing protective zone urbanism opinions: central ministry versus decentralized services under Law 422/2001

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory binding nature of the decision issued in the interest of the law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

R O M Â N I A

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru soluționarea recursului în interesul legii

Minuta deciziei nr. 12 Dosar nr. 1133/1/2021

Şedinţa de la 28 iunie 2021

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E :

Admite recursul în interesul legii formulat de Colegiul de conducere al Curţii de Apel Iași şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:

În interpretarea și aplicarea unitară a dispoziţiilor art. 311, art. 32 alin. (5) lit. a), art. 39, art. 44, art. 45, art. 47 alin. (1) şi (2), art. 56 alin. (1), (4), (6) şi (7) și art. 64 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 350/2001 privind amenajarea teritoriului şi urbanismul, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, raportate la art. 66 din Legea nr. 24/2000 privind normele de tehnică legislativă pentru elaborarea actelor normative, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, hotărârea consiliului local de aprobare a unui plan urbanistic zonal reprezintă un act administrativ cu caracter normativ.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 28 iunie 2021.