Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_175890 AI generated

Nature of deadline in construction violation report where legalization procedure was not completed and no demolition order obtained

Case Number ICCJ_175890
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the appeal in the public interest filed by the appellate court's leadership, establishing a binding uniform interpretation for the civil procedure code. The dispute concerned the legal nature of a deadline stipulated in an administrative violation report under construction law, specifically whether it functioned as a mandatory expiration point or a recommendation when the authority failed to secure a demolition order and the party did not complete the legalization process within the allotted time. Relying on Article 28 of Law no. 50/1991 regarding construction authorization, the court determined that in such circumstances, the deadline in the violation report is of a recommendatory nature, not obligatory.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art.28 din Legea nr. 50/1991, art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă; Nature of deadline in construction violation report where legalization procedure was not completed and no demolition order obtained: The dispute concerned the legal nature of a deadline stipulated in an administrative violation report under construction law, specifically whether it functioned as a mandatory expiration point or a recommendation when the authority failed to secure a demolition order and the party did not complete the legalization process within the allotted time. Relying on Article 28 of Law no. 50/1991 regarding construction authorization, the court determined that in such circumstances, the deadline in the violation report is of a recommendatory nature, not obligatory.

Keywords

AI generated
demolition order mandatory nature article of civil procedure procedural deadline administrative authority interpretation of the law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art.28 din Legea nr. 50/1991
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the final operative order to establish the mandatory nature of the court's decision regarding the uniform interpretation of the law.
AI generated
ICCJ_180916
Deadline to regularize unauthorized construction is recommendatory; permit refusal based solely on expiry invalid without demolition judgment.
Decizia nr. 35/2020
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on whether the statutory deadline for construction legalization is mandatory or recommendatory
ICCJ_157822
Interpretation of the imperativeness of the regularization deadline in construction violation proceedings under Article 28 of Law No. 50/1991
Decizia nr. 1/2024
Prerequisites for judicial demolition of unauthorized construction after failure to legalize within statutory term
Decizia nr. 168/2025
Prescriptibility of unauthorized construction demolition actions under Law 50/1991

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the final operative order to establish the mandatory nature of the court's decision regarding the uniform interpretation of the law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

R O M Â N I A

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru soluționarea recursului în interesul legii

Minuta deciziei nr. 10 Dosar nr. 800/1/2021

Şedinţa de la 28 iunie 2021

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E :

Admite recursul în interesul legii formulat de Colegiul de conducere al Curţii de Apel Alba Iulia şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:

În interpretarea şi aplicarea unitară a dispoziţiilor art.28 din Legea nr. 50/1991 privind autorizarea executării lucrărilor de construcţii, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, în ipoteza în care partea nu a demarat sau nu a finalizat, în termenul acordat, procedura de intrare în legalitate, iar autoritatea nu a obţinut o hotărâre de demolare a construcţiei, termenul stabilit în procesul-verbal de constatare a contravenţiei este unul de recomandare.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 28 iunie 2021.