Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_172360 AI generated

Temporal scope of Art. 906(4) CPC: application of 2018 amendment to post-enactment damage claims in pre-existing enforcement proceedings

Case Number ICCJ_172360
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court (High Court of Cassation and Justice) dismissed as inadmissible the referral of a question of law submitted by the Maramureș County Court, leaving the lower court's procedural handling of the case to proceed without a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court. The dispute concerned the temporal scope of application of the 2018 amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure regarding claims for damages, specifically whether the new provisions applied only to enforcement proceedings initiated after the law's entry into force or also to damages claims filed after that date for enforcement actions initiated previously. The decisive legal basis was Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, under which the Supreme Court rejected the referral for failing to meet the admissibility criteria for resolving questions of law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 1 pct. 68 din Legea nr. 310/2018, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Temporal scope of Art. 906(4) CPC: application of 2018 amendment to post-enactment damage claims in pre-existing enforcement proceedings: The dispute concerned the temporal scope of application of the 2018 amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure regarding claims for damages, specifically whether the new provisions applied only to enforcement proceedings initiated after the law's entry into force or also to damages claims filed after that date for enforcement actions initiated previously. The decisive legal basis was Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, under which the Supreme Court rejected the referral for failing to meet the admissibility criteria for resolving questions of law.

Keywords

AI generated
amendment of the claim preliminary ruling procedure article of civil procedure actions for damages enforcement of ruling scope of applicable law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 1 pct. 68 din Legea nr. 310/2018
(4) din Codul de procedură civilă, astfel cum a fost modificat prin art. 1 pct. 68 din Legea nr. 310/2018, respectiv dacă dispoziţia modificată se aplică doar executărilor silite începute după intrarea în vigoare a Legii nr.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the obligatory effect of the decision on the referring court.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 26/2022
Preliminary ruling on valuation after Constitutional Court repeal rejected as inadmissible following legislative amendment.
Decizia nr. 2872/2003
Temporal application of new cassation jurisdiction: Pre-amendment judgments remain subject to prior appellate routes and competent courts
Decizia nr. 48/2020
Admissibility of civil revision for violation of EU law primacy absent statutory basis in Code of Civil Procedure
Decizia nr. 1802/2024
Housing delivery damages: inadmissibility of revision for violation of the positive effect of res judicata under pre-2018 CPC
Decizia nr. 1297/2019
Revizuirea hotărârii civile în lipsa invocării excepției de neconstituţionalitate în cauza de fond

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the obligatory effect of the decision on the referring court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 30 Dosar nr. 497/1/2021

Şedinţa din 17 mai 2021

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Maramureş - Secţia I Civilă în dosarul nr. 681/336/2019 în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Modul de interpretare şi aplicare a dispoziţiilor art. 906 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă, astfel cum a fost modificat prin art. 1 pct. 68 din Legea nr. 310/2018, respectiv dacă dispoziţia modificată se aplică doar executărilor silite începute după intrarea în vigoare a Legii nr. 310/2018 sau se aplică şi cererilor de stabilire a despăgubirilor, introduse după intrarea în vigoare a Legii nr. 310/2018, indiferent de data la care a fost formulată cererea de executare silită”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 17 mai 2021.