Shareholder exclusion grounds are exhaustive under Companies Law; civil code cannot extend them
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the referral from the Oradea Court of Appeal and ruled that the grounds for excluding a shareholder under Article 222 of Law No. 31/1990 (Companies Law) are not supplemented by Article 1,928 of the Civil Code (Law No. 287/2009), meaning the statutory list of exclusion grounds is exhaustive and cannot be extended via general civil contract provisions. The decision, rendered in a preliminary ruling procedure for the interpretation of law, is binding under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code and resolves the legal question in favor of a restrictive reading of the Companies Law.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 222 din Legea nr. 31/1990, Art. 1.928 din Legea nr. 287/2009 privind Codul civil, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Shareholder exclusion grounds are exhaustive under Companies Law; civil code cannot extend them: 31/1990 (Companies Law) are not supplemented by Article 1,928 of the Civil Code (Law No. 287/2009), meaning the statutory list of exclusion grounds is exhaustive and cannot be extended via general civil contract provisions. The decision, rendered in a preliminary ruling procedure for the interpretation of law, is binding under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code and resolves the legal question in favor of a restrictive reading of the Companies Law.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedMain ground: the Court ruled that the exclusion hypotheses under this article are not complemented by Art. 1928 Civil Code.
Main ground: the Court established that this provision does not complement the exclusion hypotheses of Art. 222 Law No. 31/1990.
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive: the ruling is declared mandatory.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr.28 Dosar nr. 373/1/2021
Şedinţa din 10 mai 2021
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Admite sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Oradea – Secţia a II-a Civilă și, în consecință, stabilește că:
Ipotezele de excludere a asociatului prevăzute de art. 222 din Legea nr. 31/1990, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, nu se completează cu prevederile art. 1.928 din Legea nr. 287/2009 privind Codul civil.
Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 10 mai 2021.